BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30814032)

  • 1. 33-month-old children succeed in a false belief task with reduced processing demands: A replication of Setoh et al. (2016).
    Grosso SS; Schuwerk T; Kaltefleiter LJ; Sodian B
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Feb; 54():151-155. PubMed ID: 30814032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing Demands Impact 3-Year-Olds' Performance in a Spontaneous-Response Task: New Evidence for the Processing-Load Account of Early False-Belief Understanding.
    Scott RM; Roby E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142405. PubMed ID: 26562840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-and-a-half-year-olds succeed at a traditional false-belief task with reduced processing demands.
    Setoh P; Scott RM; Baillargeon R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(47):13360-13365. PubMed ID: 27821728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 2.5-year-olds succeed in identity and location elicited-response false-belief tasks with adequate response practice.
    Scott RM; Roby E; Setoh P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Oct; 198():104890. PubMed ID: 32653728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between parental mental-state language and 2.5-year-olds' performance on a nontraditional false-belief task.
    Roby E; Scott RM
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():10-23. PubMed ID: 29981965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and generalizability of an acted-out false belief task in 3-year-olds.
    Dörrenberg S; Wenzel L; Proft M; Rakoczy H; Liszkowski U
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Feb; 54():13-21. PubMed ID: 30513405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False belief and sentence complement performance in children with specific language impairment.
    Miller C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2004; 39(2):191-213. PubMed ID: 15204451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False-belief understanding in 2.5-year-olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous-response tasks.
    Scott RM; He Z; Baillargeon R; Cummins D
    Dev Sci; 2012 Mar; 15(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 22356174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuity from an implicit to an explicit understanding of false belief from infancy to preschool age.
    Thoermer C; Sodian B; Vuori M; Perst H; Kristen S
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):172-87. PubMed ID: 22429040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infants' performance in spontaneous-response false belief tasks: A review and meta-analysis.
    Barone P; Corradi G; Gomila A
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Nov; 57():101350. PubMed ID: 31445431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A longitudinal, microgenetic study of the emergence of false belief understanding and inhibition skills.
    Flynn E; O'Malley C; Wood D
    Dev Sci; 2004 Feb; 7(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 15323122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deception dissociates from false belief reasoning in deaf children: implications for the implicit versus explicit theory of mind distinction.
    de Villiers PA; de Villiers JG
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):188-209. PubMed ID: 22429041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of labeling on preschoolers' explicit false belief performance: outcomes of cognitive flexibility or inhibitory control?
    Low J; Simpson S
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(3):1072-84. PubMed ID: 22364371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's understanding of idioms and theory of mind development.
    Caillies S; Le Sourn-Bissaoui S
    Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 18801126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early conversational environment enables spontaneous belief attribution in deaf children.
    Meristo M; Strid K; Hjelmquist E
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():139-145. PubMed ID: 27636329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bridging the gap between implicit and explicit understanding: how language development promotes the processing and representation of false belief.
    San Juan V; Astington JW
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):105-22. PubMed ID: 22429036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring links between language and cognition in autism spectrum disorders: Complement sentences, false belief, and executive functioning.
    Durrleman S; Franck J
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 54():15-31. PubMed ID: 25637130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription.
    Back E; Apperly IA
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 20060965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit and explicit false belief development in preschool children.
    Grosse Wiesmann C; Friederici AD; Singer T; Steinbeis N
    Dev Sci; 2017 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 27696613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Making sense of early false-belief understanding.
    Helming KA; Strickland B; Jacob P
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 18(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 24612994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.