170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30814328)
1. Hemodynamic differences between Pipeline and coil-adjunctive intracranial stents.
Jankowitz BT; Gross BA; Seshadhri S; Girdhar G; Jadhav A; Jovin TG; Wainwright JM
J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Sep; 11(9):908-911. PubMed ID: 30814328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device.
Wang C; Tian Z; Liu J; Jing L; Paliwal N; Wang S; Zhang Y; Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Meng H; Yang X
J Transl Med; 2016 Jul; 14(1):199. PubMed ID: 27370946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms.
Xiang J; Damiano RJ; Lin N; Snyder KV; Siddiqui AH; Levy EI; Meng H
J Neurosurg; 2015 Oct; 123(4):832-40. PubMed ID: 26090829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational Study of Hemodynamic Changes Induced by Overlapping and Compacting of Stents and Flow Diverter in Cerebral Aneurysms.
Kim S; Yang H; Hong I; Oh JH; Kim YB
Front Neurol; 2021; 12():705841. PubMed ID: 34408723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents.
Dholakia RJ; Kappel AD; Pagano A; Woo HH; Lieber BB; Fiorella DJ; Sadasivan C
Interv Neuroradiol; 2018 Apr; 24(2):150-161. PubMed ID: 29239685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations by a self-expandable intracranial stent and flow diversion stent: high intra-aneurysmal pressure remains regardless of flow velocity reduction.
Shobayashi Y; Tateshima S; Kakizaki R; Sudo R; Tanishita K; Viñuela F
J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():iii38-42. PubMed ID: 23048176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between the new Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Blue) stent and the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) in bench-top and cadaver studies.
Matsuda Y; Chung J; Keigher K; Lopes D
J Neurointerv Surg; 2018 Mar; 10(3):274-278. PubMed ID: 28939583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual flow-diverter treatment planning: The effect of device placement on bifurcation aneurysm haemodynamics.
Peach T; Spranger K; Ventikos Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 May; 231(5):432-443. PubMed ID: 27780870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic differences by increasing low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent local compaction across intracranial aneurysm orifice.
Tian Z; Zhang M; Li G; Jin R; Leng X; Zhang Y; Wang K; Zhang Y; Yang X; Xiang J; Liu J
Interv Neuroradiol; 2020 Oct; 26(5):557-565. PubMed ID: 32830566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow Diversion via LVIS Blue Stent within Enterprise Stent in Patients with Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm.
Lim YC; Shin YS; Chung J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():203-207. PubMed ID: 29909212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. LVIS Blue as a low porosity stent and coil adjuvant.
Koch MJ; Stapleton CJ; Raymond SB; Williams S; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Rabinov JD; Patel AB
J Neurointerv Surg; 2018 Jul; 10(7):682-686. PubMed ID: 29331948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Virtual Comparison of the eCLIPs Device and Conventional Flow-Diverters as Treatment for Cerebral Bifurcation Aneurysms.
Peach TW; Ricci D; Ventikos Y
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2019 Sep; 10(3):508-519. PubMed ID: 31286438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device, LVIS Blue: laboratory comparison between old and new LVIS.
Chung J; Matsuda Y; Nelson J; Keigher K; Lopes DK
Neurol Res; 2018 Jan; 40(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 29105602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of stents and flow diverters on hemodynamics in idealized aneurysm models.
Seshadhri S; Janiga G; Beuing O; Skalej M; Thévenin D
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071005. PubMed ID: 21823744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamics of Flow Diverters.
Dholakia R; Sadasivan C; Fiorella DJ; Woo HH; Lieber BB
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Feb; 139(2):. PubMed ID: 27727400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic Comparison Study.
Li W; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang K; Zhang Y; Tian Z; Yang X; Liu J
Front Neurol; 2019; 10():522. PubMed ID: 31191428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of computer simulation to assess flow diversion treatment outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang M; Tupin S; Anzai H; Kohata Y; Shojima M; Suzuki K; Okamoto Y; Tanaka K; Yagi T; Fujimura S; Ohta M
J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 33097626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element modeling of endovascular coiling and flow diversion enables hemodynamic prediction of complex treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysm.
Damiano RJ; Ma D; Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Snyder KV; Meng H
J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3332-40. PubMed ID: 26169778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow.
Augsburger L; Farhat M; Reymond P; Fonck E; Kulcsar Z; Stergiopulos N; Rüfenacht DA
Klin Neuroradiol; 2009 Aug; 19(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 19705075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alteration of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics for flow diversion using enterprise and vision stents.
Tremmel M; Xiang J; Natarajan SK; Hopkins LN; Siddiqui AH; Levy EI; Meng H
World Neurosurg; 2010; 74(2-3):306-15. PubMed ID: 21197155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
