These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30814957)

  • 1. How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Reports and Forensic Evidence? The Experiences, Perceptions, and Narratives of Swiss Judges and Other Legal Experts.
    Canela C; Buadze A; Dube A; Jackowski C; Pude I; Nellen R; Signorini P; Liebrenz M
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():18. PubMed ID: 30814957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Sexual offences--selected cases].
    Łabecka M; Jarzabek-Bielecka G; Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Apr; 84(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 23700866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expert opinions on criminal law cases in Switzerland - an empirical pilot study.
    Bevilacqua L; Calfisch A; Endrass J; Rossegger A; Hachtel H; Graf M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2023 May; 153():40073. PubMed ID: 37229770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A nationwide questionnaire survey of medical experts in mental health evaluation].
    Koike J; Morita N; Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19301591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Educator of the Court: The Role of the Expert Witness in Cases Involving Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    Berryessa CM
    Psychol Crime Law; 2017; 23(6):575-600. PubMed ID: 28943746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Veterinary Expert: Legal Nature and Responsibility.
    Dzikowski A
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 37443961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychiatrists, criminals, and the law: forensic psychiatry in Switzerland 1850-1950.
    Germann U
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24145062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic criteria, clinical and theoretical issues of the indication of court-ordered treatment: A comparative survey among experts in forensic psychiatry and sentencing judges in France.
    Roux B; Giravalli P; Tuchtan L; Delteil C; Bartoli C; Guivarch J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024 Jul; 95():102006. PubMed ID: 38972086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The psychiatric expert witness in the criminal justice system.
    Mullen PE
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2010 Jul; 20(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 20549780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--stand for evaluating medical expert assessment].
    Kienzle HF
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):592-6. PubMed ID: 9064929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judges' perceptions of expert reports: The effect of neuroscience evidence.
    Moulin V; Mouchet C; Pillonel T; Gkotsi GM; Baertschi B; Gasser J; Testé B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():22-29. PubMed ID: 30454558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Historical and Comparative Review of the Reception of Forensic Medical and Scientific Evidence under Different Systems of Law.
    Havard JD
    Forensic Sci Rev; 1991 Jun; 3(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 26266991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of District Judges and Lawyers Towards Medico-legal Reports, Medical Certificates and Medical Expert Opinion.
    Subedi N; Giri HR
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2018; 56(212):735-739. PubMed ID: 30387459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demonstrating reliability through transparency: A scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings.
    Carr S; Piasecki E; Gallop A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110110. PubMed ID: 31959481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical and scientific organizations and scientific evidence in U.S. trials: lessons from European legal theory.
    Deftos LJ
    Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10099641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.