237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30815756)
21. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?
Ross WA; Thirumurthi S; Lynch PM; Rashid A; Pande M; Shafi MA; Lee JH; Raju GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 25583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Correlation between adenoma detection rate and advanced adenoma detection rate].
Lee SY; Kim NH; Chae HB; Han KJ; Lee TH; Jang CM; Yoo KM; Jung YS; Park JH; Kim HJ; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI; Park DI
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 25073667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adenoma detection rate influences the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in low-risk patients.
Kim TJ; Kim ER; Hong SN; Kim YH; Baek SY; Ahn S; Chang DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):809-817.e1. PubMed ID: 28987544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Colonoscopy quality assessment.
Fayad NF; Kahi CJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Apr; 25(2):373-86. PubMed ID: 25839691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification of physicians with unusual performance in screening colonoscopy databases: a Bayesian approach.
Stock C; Uhlmann L; Hoffmeister M; Laux G; Kieser M; Brenner H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):646-654.e1. PubMed ID: 25523387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring.
Kaltenbach T; Gawron A; Meyer CS; Gupta S; Shergill A; Dominitz JA; Soetikno RM; Nguyen-Vu T; A Whooley M; Kahi CJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1883-1889.e1. PubMed ID: 33618027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.
Do A; Weinberg J; Kakkar A; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 23211748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can I improve my adenoma detection rate?
Chaptini L; Laine L
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):270-81. PubMed ID: 25647725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience.
Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Johnson CS; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 24246797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An Evaluation of Critical Factors for the Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection: Sensitivity and Threshold Analyses Using a Microsimulation Model.
Thiruvengadam NR; Coté GA; Gupta S; Rodrigues M; Schneider Y; Arain MA; Solaimani P; Serrao S; Kochman ML; Saumoy M
Gastroenterology; 2023 May; 164(6):906-920. PubMed ID: 36736437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Defining and Applying Locally Relevant Benchmarks for the Adenoma Detection Rate.
Hilsden RJ; Rose SM; Dube C; Rostom A; Bridges R; McGregor SE; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Aug; 114(8):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 30848731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Causes and Prevention of Interval Colorectal Cancer].
Lee JY; Lee JH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 75(6):314-321. PubMed ID: 32581202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multidirectional Colonoscopy Quality Improvement Increases Adenoma Detection Rate: Results of the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center Colonoscopy Quality Upgrade Project (Gangnam-CUP).
Seo JY; Jin EH; Bae JH; Lim JH; Chung GE; Lee C; Kwak MS; Kang HY; Song JH; Yang SY; Yang JI; Lim SH; Yim JY; Kim JS; Chung SJ
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Jun; 65(6):1806-1815. PubMed ID: 31732905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.
Brenner H; Altenhofen L; Kretschmann J; Rösch T; Pox C; Stock C; Hoffmeister M
Gastroenterology; 2015 Aug; 149(2):356-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25911510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
