191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30816735)
1. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing learned predictiveness effects within and across compound discriminations.
Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; De Fina NL; Harris JA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):446-65. PubMed ID: 21517197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transfer of absolute and relative predictiveness in human contingency learning.
Kattner F
Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 25425296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Explaining learned predictiveness: Roles of attention and integration of associative structures.
Rodríguez G; Hall G
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30945925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
Byrom NC; Murphy RA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfer of dimensional associability in human contingency learning.
Kattner F; Green CS
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 26569016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blocking and associability change.
Jones PM; Haselgrove M
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learned predictiveness and outcome predictability effects are not simply two sides of the same coin.
Thorwart A; Livesey EJ; Wilhelm F; Liu W; Lachnit H
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(4):341-365. PubMed ID: 28981309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.
Delamater AR; Garr E; Lawrence S; Whitlow JW
Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():40-52. PubMed ID: 27826037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automaticity and cognitive control in the learned predictiveness effect.
Shone LT; Harris IM; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 25706543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
Harris JA; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexible Configural Learning of Non-Linear Discriminations and Detection of Stimulus Compounds.
Glautier S; Menneer T; Godwin HJ; Donnelly N; Aristizabal JA
Exp Psychol; 2016 Jul; 63(4):215-236. PubMed ID: 27750517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resistance to instructed reversal of the learned predictiveness effect.
Don HJ; Livesey EJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1327-47. PubMed ID: 25383751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association rules for rat spatial learning: the importance of the hippocampus for binding item identity with item location.
Albasser MM; Dumont JR; Amin E; Holmes JD; Horne MR; Pearce JM; Aggleton JP
Hippocampus; 2013 Dec; 23(12):1162-78. PubMed ID: 23749378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Associative relationships in human predictive learning.
Gámez AM; Martos R; Abad MJ; Rosas JM
Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E5. PubMed ID: 23866246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect.
Griffiths O; Livesey E; Thorwart A
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30604992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dorsolateral striatum is critical for the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability.
Asem JS; Schiffino FL; Holland PC
Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 42(5):2203-13. PubMed ID: 26108257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in attention to an irrelevant cue that accompanies a negative patterning [corrected] discrimination.
Dopson JC; Esber GR; Pearce JM
Learn Behav; 2011 Dec; 39(4):336-49. PubMed ID: 21499985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
