These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30816766)

  • 1. Sequence as context in category learning: An eyetracking study.
    Zaki SR; Salmi IL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1942-1954. PubMed ID: 30816766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature highlighting enhances learning of a complex natural-science category.
    Miyatsu T; Gouravajhala R; Nosofsky RM; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 29698049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eyetracking reveals multiple-category use in induction.
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1050-67. PubMed ID: 26727126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The indirect modification of categorical knowledge.
    Homa D; Rogers D; Lancaster ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 24838308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item-to-item associations in typing: Evidence from spin list sequence learning.
    Lindsey DRB; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):397-416. PubMed ID: 29999400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relational discovery in category learning.
    Goldwater MB; Don HJ; Krusche MJF; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jan; 147(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 29309195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prior experience of variability influences generalisation of unspecified categories.
    Hosch AK; Wirtz P; von Helversen B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jul; 77(7):1518-1532. PubMed ID: 37872688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual and age differences in block-by-block dynamics of category learning strategies.
    Gouravajhala R; Wahlheim CN; McDaniel MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):578-593. PubMed ID: 31747828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.
    Bugg JM; Dey A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1905-1932. PubMed ID: 30211592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sequence of study changes what information is attended to, encoded, and remembered during category learning.
    Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1699-1719. PubMed ID: 28333507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mark my words: High frequency marker words impact early stages of language learning.
    Frost RLA; Monaghan P; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1883-1898. PubMed ID: 30652894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification errors and response times over multiple distributed sessions as a function of category structure.
    Zeigler DE; Vigo R
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1041-1057. PubMed ID: 29752660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning and transfer of category knowledge in an indirect categorization task.
    Helie S; Ashby FG
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 21660482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.
    Lancaster ME; Shelhamer R; Homa D
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 23192309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disentangling the effects of attentional weighting and associative mediation in perceptual learning reveals no evidence for associative mediation.
    George DN; Oltean BP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1207-1225. PubMed ID: 31621361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison-based learning of relational categories (you'll never guess).
    Patterson JD; Kurtz KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):851-871. PubMed ID: 31535890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Out of sight, out of mind: Categorization learning and normal aging.
    Schenk S; Minda JP; Lech RK; Suchan B
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():222-233. PubMed ID: 27534998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The learning of basic-level categories by pigeons: the prototype effect, attention, and effects of categorization.
    Jitsumori M; Ohkita M; Ushitani T
    Learn Behav; 2011 Sep; 39(3):271-87. PubMed ID: 21484235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning relational concepts from within- versus between-category comparisons.
    Corral D; Kurtz KJ; Jones M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Nov; 147(11):1571-1596. PubMed ID: 30372111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.