These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30816787)

  • 1. Expecting the unexpected: Violation of expectation shifts strategies toward information exploration.
    Chen H; Yan N; Zhu P; Wyble B; Eitam B; Shen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):513-522. PubMed ID: 30816787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Saccadic selection does not eliminate attribute amnesia.
    Born S; Puntiroli M; Jordan D; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 30883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory representations persist in the face of unexpected task alterations.
    Swan G; Wyble B; Chen H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1408-1414. PubMed ID: 28386882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning how to exploit sources of information.
    Wyble B; Hess M; O'Donnell RE; Chen H; Eitam B
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):696-705. PubMed ID: 30547364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using attribute amnesia to test the limits of hyper-binding and associative deficits in working memory.
    McCormick-Huhn JM; Chen H; Wyble BP; Dennis NA
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Feb; 33(1):165-175. PubMed ID: 29494187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does attribute amnesia occur with the presentation of complex, meaningful stimuli? The answer is, "it depends".
    Chen H; Yu J; Fu Y; Zhu P; Li W; Zhou J; Shen M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1133-1144. PubMed ID: 30924060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attribute amnesia reflects a lack of memory consolidation for attended information.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26348066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No explicit memory for individual trial display configurations in a visual search task.
    O'Donnell RE; Chen H; Wyble B
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1705-1721. PubMed ID: 34100195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the attribute amnesia paradigm to test the automatic memory advantage of person names.
    Liu Y; Huang C; Huang X; Chen H; Qin P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2019-2026. PubMed ID: 34254264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory for a single object has differently variable precisions for relevant and irrelevant features.
    Swan G; Collins J; Wyble B
    J Vis; 2016; 16(3):32. PubMed ID: 26913624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory consolidation of attended information is optional: Comment on Jiang et al. (2016).
    Wyble B; Chen H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):997-1000. PubMed ID: 28557486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Slipping through the cracks: The peril of unexpected interruption on the contents of working memory.
    O'Donnell RE; Wyble B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jun; 49(6):990-1003. PubMed ID: 36634014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Great expectations: temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing speed.
    Vangkilde S; Coull JT; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1183-91. PubMed ID: 22250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional influences on memory formation: A tale of a not-so-simple story.
    Ortiz-Tudela J; Milliken B; Jiménez L; Lupiáñez J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):544-557. PubMed ID: 29330686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remembering more than you can say: Re-examining "amnesia" of attended attributes.
    Harrison GW; Kang M; Wilson DE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Mar; 214():103265. PubMed ID: 33601162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Neural Mechanism for Surprise-related Interruptions of Visuospatial Working Memory.
    Wessel JR
    Cereb Cortex; 2018 Jan; 28(1):199-212. PubMed ID: 27909006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory for recently accessed visual attributes.
    Jiang YV; Shupe JM; Swallow KM; Tan DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1331-7. PubMed ID: 26844575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How memory is tested influences what is measured: Reply to Wyble and Chen (2017).
    Swallow KM; Jiang YV; Tan DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1001-1003. PubMed ID: 28557487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The location but not the attributes of visual cues are automatically encoded into working memory.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():76-85. PubMed ID: 25490435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic relation vs. surprise: the differential effects of related and unrelated co-verbal gestures on neural encoding and subsequent recognition.
    Straube B; Meyer L; Green A; Kircher T
    Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 1567():42-56. PubMed ID: 24746497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.