195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30816788)
1. Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
Shurygina O; Kristjánsson Á; Tudge L; Chetverikov A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):489-499. PubMed ID: 30816788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects.
Kristjánsson A; Sigurjónsdóttir O; Driver J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1229-36. PubMed ID: 20601703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An imagery-induced reversal of intertrial priming in visual search.
Cochrane BA; Nwabuike AA; Thomson DR; Milliken B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):572-587. PubMed ID: 29094983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-examining Maljkovic and Nakayama (1994): Conscious expectancy does affect the Priming of Pop-out effect.
Cochrane BA; Pratt J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2693-2702. PubMed ID: 32333373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
Grubert A; Eimer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinct, but top-down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search.
Geyer T; Müller HJ
Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 19082623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel demonstration of preparation in pop-out search.
Sclodnick B; Sun H; Milliken B
Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Jun; 78(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 38330339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feature-based attention across saccades and immediate postsaccadic selection.
Eymond C; Cavanagh P; Collins T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1293-301. PubMed ID: 27084700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across feature dimensions.
York AA; Sewell DK; Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1368-1386. PubMed ID: 32881554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Permeability of priming of pop out to expectations.
Pascucci D; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
Won BY; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repetition priming in selective attention: A TVA analysis.
Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á; Bundesen C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():35-42. PubMed ID: 26163225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When age is irrelevant: distractor inhibition and target activation in priming of pop-out.
Wnuczko M; Pratt J; Hasher L; Walker R
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 May; 67(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 22082524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.
Caddigan E; Lleras A
J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):9. PubMed ID: 21135256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Top-down expectancy versus bottom-up guidance in search for known color-form conjunctions.
Anderson GM; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2622-39. PubMed ID: 26198709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
