These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30816789)

  • 1. Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.
    Matheson HE; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):441-457. PubMed ID: 30816789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating grounded conceptualization: motor system state-dependence facilitates familiarity judgments of novel tools.
    Matheson HE; Familiar AM; Thompson-Schill SL
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):216-226. PubMed ID: 29500490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals.
    Matheson HE; White NC; McMullen PA
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):465-82. PubMed ID: 23873434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.
    De Bellis F; Ferrara A; Errico D; Panico F; Sagliano L; Conson M; Trojano L
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26358123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 31343245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation.
    Muto H; Matsushita S; Morikawa K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):337-355. PubMed ID: 28795837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separating the effects of stimulus-gravity compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on visuomotor synchronization.
    Zhou L; Shangguan M; Xing L; Yu H; Wang H; Hove MJ; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):405-415. PubMed ID: 32223292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It goes with the territory: Ownership across spatial boundaries.
    Strachan JWA; Constable MD; Knoblich G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):789-797. PubMed ID: 32271083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization.
    Kalénine S; Shapiro AD; Flumini A; Borghi AM; Buxbaum LJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):645-51. PubMed ID: 24186270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handles of manipulable objects attract covert visual attention: ERP evidence.
    Matheson H; Newman AJ; Satel J; McMullen P
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():17-23. PubMed ID: 24534775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional tool actions in near and far space affect the distribution of visual attention along the tool.
    Park GD; Reed CL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):388-404. PubMed ID: 32223291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects.
    Vainio L; Hammaren L; Hausen M; Rekolainen E; Riskila S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1094-110. PubMed ID: 21279867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A diffusion model analysis of the response-effect compatibility effect.
    Janczyk M; Lerche V
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Feb; 148(2):237-251. PubMed ID: 29847981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: Evidence of Simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction.
    Pellicano A; Koch I; Binkofski F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1647-1666. PubMed ID: 28414500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Affordance Compatibility Effect for Word Learning in Virtual Reality.
    Gordon CL; Shea TM; Noelle DC; Balasubramaniam R
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jun; 43(6):e12742. PubMed ID: 31204801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do manufactured and natural objects evoke similar motor information? The case of action priming.
    Godard M; Wamain Y; Kalénine S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2801-2806. PubMed ID: 31216944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.