These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30817033)

  • 1. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remodeling male coercion and the evolution of sexual autonomy by mate choice.
    Snow SS; Prum RO
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(7):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 37260260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.
    Brennan PL; Prum RO
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2324-38. PubMed ID: 22777020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.
    Okada K; Katsuki M; Sharma MD; House CM; Hosken DJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140281. PubMed ID: 24807253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.
    Gavrilets S; Arnqvist G; Friberg U
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):531-9. PubMed ID: 11296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response.
    Hall M; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Jan; 4():1. PubMed ID: 14720309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflict between direct and indirect benefits of female choice in desert Drosophila.
    Onealt E; Connallon T; Knowles LL
    Biol Lett; 2007 Feb; 3(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 17443958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Offspring viability benefits but no apparent costs of mating with high quality males.
    Simmons LW; Holley R
    Biol Lett; 2011 Jun; 7(3):419-21. PubMed ID: 21123248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms.
    Dhole S; Stern CA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 29528491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
    Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.
    Parker GA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):235-59. PubMed ID: 16612884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.