BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30817644)

  • 1. A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty.
    Qiu CS; Hockney SM; Turin SY; Dorfman RG; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):734-742. PubMed ID: 30817644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Happy and Unhappy Patients: A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Breast Augmentation.
    Dorfman RG; Purnell C; Qiu C; Ellis MF; Basu CB; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):663e-673e. PubMed ID: 29697608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Positive Patient Experience: A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastic Surgery Online Reviews.
    Chang IA; Wells MW; Chang IA; Arquette CP; Tang CJ; Gatherwright JR; Furnas HJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Aug; 42(9):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 35417545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient Reviews: Yelp, Google, Healthgrades, Vitals, and RealSelf.
    Furnas HJ; Korman JM; Canales FL; Pence LD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 33234982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.
    Marrero K; King E; Fingeret AL
    J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():510-515. PubMed ID: 31446193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient use of social media to evaluate cosmetic treatments and procedures.
    Schlichte MJ; Karimkhani C; Jones T; Trikha R; Dellavalle RP
    Dermatol Online J; 2015 Apr; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 25933082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do online reviews diminish physician authority? The case of cosmetic surgery in the U.S.
    Menon AV
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 May; 181():1-8. PubMed ID: 28363107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Ratings Game: Demographic and Practice Factors Affecting Yelp Ratings of Plastic Surgeons.
    Mark EJ; Driskill EK; Fisher CT; Swinehart SV; Bradford PS; Jones M; DeGeorge BR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):463-471. PubMed ID: 36780357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors impacting patient ratings of Mohs micrographic surgeons: Lessons gleaned from analysis of 17,527 online reviews.
    Trager MH; Ensslin CE; Fan W; Samie FH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Dec; 83(6):1825-1827. PubMed ID: 32450101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision Abdominoplasty with Truncal Liposculpting: A 10-Year Experience.
    Sterodimas A; Boriani F; Nicaretta B; Pereira LH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Feb; 43(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 29948100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Patients' decision for aesthetic surgery].
    Fansa H; Haller S
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2011 Dec; 43(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 22241520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abdominoplasty: Risk Factors, Complication Rates, and Safety of Combined Procedures.
    Winocour J; Gupta V; Ramirez JR; Shack RB; Grotting JC; Higdon KK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):597e-606e. PubMed ID: 26505716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Complications and level of satisfaction after dermolipectomy and abdominoplasty post-bariatric surgery].
    García-García ML; Martín-Lorenzo JG; Campillo-Soto A; Torralba-Martínez JA; Lirón-Ruiz R; Miguel-Perelló J; Mengual-Ballester M; Aguayo-Albasini JL
    Cir Esp; 2014 Apr; 92(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 24360407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimizing the Short-term Reoperation Rate in Abdominoplasty Procedures by Prolonged Postoperative Immobilization.
    Schwaiger K; Tiede S; Hitzl W; Kaplan R; DeMeyer F; Heinrich K; Hladik M; Wechselberger G; Russe E
    Obes Surg; 2018 Oct; 28(10):3253-3258. PubMed ID: 29909511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.