229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30817661)
1. Eruption of Maxillary Posterior Permanent Molars following Early Conventional Le Fort III Advancement and Early Le Fort III Distraction Procedures Compared to Late Surgical Intervention.
Gonchar MN; Bekisz JM; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG; Shetye PR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):565e-571e. PubMed ID: 30817661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of an early Le Fort III surgery on permanent molar eruption.
Santiago PE; Grayson BH; Degen M; Brecht LE; Singh GD; McCarthy JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 15692345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?
Engel M; Berger M; Hoffmann J; Kühle R; Rückschloss T; Ristow O; Freudlsperger C; Kansy K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30642732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meningoencephalocele and other dural disruptions: complications of Le Fort III midfacial osteotomies and distraction.
Ridgway EB; Robson CD; Padwa BL; Goumnerova LC; Mulliken JB
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):182-6. PubMed ID: 21233755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of maxillary permanent molars in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis after monobloc osteotomy and midface advancement with rigid external distraction (RED).
Sant'Anna EF; de A Cury-Saramago A; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Mar; 47(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 20210632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Le Fort III osteotomy: to distract or not to distract?
Fearon JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1091-103; discussion 1104-6. PubMed ID: 11373547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The assessment of midface distraction osteogenesis in treatment of upper airway obstruction.
Xu H; Yu Z; Mu X
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1876-81. PubMed ID: 19816368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction.
Lo LJ; Hung KF; Chen YR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Feb; 109(2):688-98; discussion 699-700. PubMed ID: 11818854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices.
Chin M; Toth BA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Sep; 100(4):819-30; discussion 831-2. PubMed ID: 9290649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomographic analysis of temporal maxillary stability and pterygomaxillary generate formation following pediatric Le Fort III distraction advancement.
Hopper RA; Sandercoe G; Woo A; Watts R; Kelley P; Ettinger RE; Saltzman B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1665-1674. PubMed ID: 21042122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Monobloc/Le Fort III Surgery on the Developing Posterior Maxillary Dentition and Its Resultant Effect on Orthognathic Surgery.
Yang R; Shakoori P; Lanni MA; Nah HD; Scott M; Swanson JW; Bartlett SP; Taylor JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):253e-259e. PubMed ID: 33235043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Le Fort III distraction using rotation advancement of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Hettinger PC; Hanson PR; Denny AD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):1532-1541. PubMed ID: 24281581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Halo distraction of the Le Fort III in syndromic craniosynostosis: a long-term assessment.
Fearon JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 May; 115(6):1524-36. PubMed ID: 15861055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Achieving differential facial changes with Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: the use of nasal passenger grafts, cerclage hinges, and segmental movements.
Hopper RA; Prucz RB; Iamphongsai S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Dec; 130(6):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 22878478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative computed tomographic scan and polysomnographic analysis of patients with syndromic midface hypoplasia before and after Le Fort III distraction advancement.
Ettinger RE; Hopper RA; Sandercoe G; Kifle Y; Saltzman B; Chen M; Perkins J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1612-1619. PubMed ID: 21460667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions.
Gosain AK; Santoro TD; Havlik RJ; Cohen SR; Holmes RE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):1797-808. PubMed ID: 11994576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft-tissue profile changes following early Le Fort III distraction in growing children with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Shetye PR; Caterson EJ; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):945-954. PubMed ID: 24076685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an internal distraction device for syndromic craniosynostosis: device selection, problems, indications, and a proposal for use of a parallel bar for device-setting.
Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Tosa Y; Kadomatsu K
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 17119404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
