These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30817952)
61. Development of the EpiOcular(TM) eye irritation test for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals in response to the requirements of the EU cosmetics directive and REACH legislation. Kaluzhny Y; Kandárová H; Hayden P; Kubilus J; d'Argembeau-Thornton L; Klausner M Altern Lab Anim; 2011 Sep; 39(4):339-64. PubMed ID: 21942547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part II: Eye. Charmeau-Genevois C; Sarang S; Perea M; Mayer N; Eadsforth C; Austin T; Thomas P Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104935. PubMed ID: 33901590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Comparative evaluation of five in vitro tests for assessing the eye irritation potential of hair-care products. Jones PA; Budynsky E; Cooper KJ; Decker D; Griffiths HA; Fentem JH Altern Lab Anim; 2001; 29(6):669-92. PubMed ID: 11709042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Prediction of eye irritation potential of liquid and granular laundry detergent formulas using the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Cater KC; Harbell JW Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 32(3):210-21. PubMed ID: 23360218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Study on the use of haemoglobin denaturation test as an alternative to Draize eye irritation test]. Liao Y; Wang X; Zhang LS; Li GM; Zhang BX Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Sep; 35(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 15460411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Performance of the DASF compared to other combinations of OECD NAMs for eye hazard identification of surfactants. Alépée N; Mewes KR; Abo T; Cavarzan A; O'Driscoll A; Adriaens E ALTEX; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39228327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants. Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18602964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. IRAG working group 1. Organotypic models for the assessment/prediction of ocular irritation. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group. Chamberlain M; Gad SC; Gautheron P; Prinsen MK Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 9100813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Toxicity evaluation of the photoprotective compound LQFM048: Eye irritation, skin toxicity and genotoxic endpoints. de Ávila RI; de Sousa Vieira M; Gaeti MP; Moreira LC; de Brito Rodrigues L; de Oliveira GA; Batista AC; Vinhal DC; Menegatti R; Valadares MC Toxicology; 2017 Feb; 376():83-93. PubMed ID: 27129947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Multi-laboratory evaluation of SkinEthic HCE test method for testing serious eye damage/eye irritation using solid chemicals and overall performance of the test method with regard to solid and liquid chemicals testing. Alépée N; Adriaens E; Grandidier MH; Meloni M; Nardelli L; Vinall CJ; Toner F; Roper CS; Van Rompay AR; Leblanc V; Cotovio J Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Aug; 34():55-70. PubMed ID: 26989001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Predictive performance of the Short Time Exposure test for identifying eye irritation potential of chemical mixtures. Saito K; Miyazawa M; Nukada Y; Ei K; Abo T; Sakaguchi H Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Apr; 29(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 25681760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Validating and troubleshooting ocular in vitro toxicology tests. Barile FA J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2010; 61(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 20096797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Ocular irritation reversibility assessment for personal care products using a porcine corneal culture assay. Donahue DA; Avalos J; Kaufman LE; Simion FA; Cerven DR Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Apr; 25(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 21172418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Histopathological evaluation of the ocular-irritation potential of shampoos, make-up removers and cleansing foams in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay. Furukawa M; Sakakibara T; Itoh K; Kawamura K; Sasaki S; Matsuura M J Toxicol Pathol; 2015 Oct; 28(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 26538816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The Short Time Exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential: intra-laboratory reproducibility and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) and EU eye irritation classification for 109 chemicals. Takahashi Y; Hayashi K; Abo T; Koike M; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1425-34. PubMed ID: 21513790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells. Takahashi Y; Koike M; Honda H; Ito Y; Sakaguchi H; Suzuki H; Nishiyama N Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Apr; 22(3):760-70. PubMed ID: 18248950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Kang Y; Jeong B; Lim DH; Lee D; Lim KM J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Dec; 84(23):960-972. PubMed ID: 34328061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Same-chemical comparison of nonanimal eye irritation test methods: Bovine corneal opacity and permeability, EpiOcular™, isolated chicken eye, ocular Irritection®, OptiSafe™, and short time exposure. Lebrun S; Nguyen L; Chavez S; Chan R; Le D; Nguyen M; Jester JV Toxicol In Vitro; 2021 Apr; 72():105070. PubMed ID: 33352259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]