These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1093 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30819240)
1. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis. Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Esophageal Anastomotic Integrity With Serial Pleural Amylase Levels. Miller DL; Helms GA; Mayfield WR Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 105(1):200-206. PubMed ID: 29191359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serial Drain Amylase Can Accurately Detect Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy and May Facilitate Early Discharge. Perry Y; Towe CW; Kwong J; Ho VP; Linden PA Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Dec; 100(6):2041-6; discussion 2046-7. PubMed ID: 26319485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy. Berkelmans GH; Kouwenhoven EA; Smeets BJ; Weijs TJ; Silva Corten LC; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 21(30):9118-25. PubMed ID: 26290638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. C-reactive protein and drain amylase: their utility in ruling out anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Stuart SK; Kuypers TJL; Martijnse IS; Heisterkamp J; Matthijsen RA Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 58(5):448-452. PubMed ID: 36346047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Value of Chest-Tube Amylase Versus C-Reactive Protein as Screening Tool for Detection of Early Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. Giulini L; Dubecz A; Solymosi N; Tank J; Renz M; Thumfart L; Stein HJ J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 30592690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Drain Amylase: A Simple and Versatile Method of Detecting Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks. Linden PA; Towe CW; Worrell SG; Jiang B; Ho VP; Argote-Greene L; Bachman K; Perry Y Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 113(6):1794-1800. PubMed ID: 34437855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of C-reactive protein as predictive biomarker of anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Asti E; Bonitta G; Melloni M; Tornese S; Milito P; Sironi A; Costa E; Bonavina L Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Mar; 403(2):235-244. PubMed ID: 29516256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak? Wang YJ; Liu XH; Mei LY; Li KK; Jiang YG; Guo W Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3943-9. PubMed ID: 26694179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk Factors of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage after McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Focus on Preoperative and Intraoperative Lung Function. Gao W; Wang M; Su P; Zhang F; Huang C; Tian Z Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Apr; 27(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 33087661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive value of postoperative serum prealbumin levels for early detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: A retrospective study. Huang J; Tian L; Wang B Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Apr; 101(17):e29201. PubMed ID: 35512077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision analysis supports the use of drain amylase-based enhanced recovery method after esophagectomy. Jiang B; Ho VP; Ginsberg J; Fu SJ; Perry Y; Argote-Greene L; Linden PA; Towe CW Dis Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 29757360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the NUn score as a predictor of anastomotic leak and major complications after Esophagectomy. Bundred J; Hollis AC; Hodson J; Hallissey MT; Whiting JL; Griffiths EA Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jan; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 31076741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection. Liesenfeld LF; Sauer P; Diener MK; Hinz U; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP; Hackert T; Büchler MW; Schaible A BMC Surg; 2020 Dec; 20(1):324. PubMed ID: 33298038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy]. Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Early detection of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy using drain amylase levels. Matsumoto T; Kikuchi H; Haneda R; Soneda W; Hirotsu A; Kawata S; Hiramatsu Y; Kamiya K; Shibata Y; Okada E; Takeuchi H Esophagus; 2021 Jul; 18(3):522-528. PubMed ID: 33641017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attempted validation of the NUn score and inflammatory markers as predictors of esophageal anastomotic leak and major complications. Findlay JM; Tilson RC; Harikrishnan A; Sgromo B; Marshall RE; Maynard ND; Gillies RS; Middleton MR Dis Esophagus; 2015 Oct; 28(7):626-33. PubMed ID: 24894195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture. Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy. Sepesi B; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Correa A; Mehran RJ; Rice D; Roth J; Vaporciyan A; Hofstetter WL J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1146-50. PubMed ID: 22939861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]