BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30820722)

  • 1. Adnexal mass staging CT with a disease-specific structured report compared to simple structured report.
    Franconeri A; Boos J; Fang J; Shenoy-Bhangle A; Perillo M; Wei CJ; Garrett L; Esselen K; Fong L; Brook OR
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4851-4860. PubMed ID: 30820722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structured vs narrative reporting of pelvic MRI for fibroids: clarity and impact on treatment planning.
    Franconeri A; Fang J; Carney B; Justaniah A; Miller L; Hur HC; King LP; Alammari R; Faintuch S; Mortele KJ; Brook OR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3009-3017. PubMed ID: 29247353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning.
    Brook OR; Brook A; Vollmer CM; Kent TS; Sanchez N; Pedrosa I
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):464-72. PubMed ID: 25286323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structured versus narrative reporting of pelvic MRI in perianal fistulizing disease: impact on clarity, completeness, and surgical planning.
    Tuncyurek O; Garces-Descovich A; Jaramillo-Cardoso A; Durán EE; Cataldo TE; Poylin VY; Gómez SF; Cabrera AM; Hegazi T; Beker K; Mortele KJ
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):811-820. PubMed ID: 30519819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bridging Communication Gaps Between Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Through Standardized Structured Cancer Imaging Reporting: The Experience with Female Pelvic MRI Assessment Using O-RADS and a Simulated Cohort Patient Group.
    Woo S; Andrieu PC; Abu-Rustum NR; Broach V; Zivanovic O; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki E; Ellis A; Carayon P; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1388-1397. PubMed ID: 37661555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ovarian Malignancy Probability Score (OMPS) for appropriate referral of adnexal masses.
    Arab M; Honarvar Z; Hosseini-Zijoud SM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(20):8647-50. PubMed ID: 25374183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) ovarian cancer quality surgical measures.
    Gogoi RP; Urban R; Sun H; Goff B
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Aug; 126(2):217-9. PubMed ID: 22561039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ovarian malignancy risk stratification of the adnexal mass using a multivariate index assay.
    Bristow RE; Smith A; Zhang Z; Chan DW; Crutcher G; Fung ET; Munroe DG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 128(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 23178277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
    Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unexpected ovarian malignancy following laparoscopic excision of adnexal masses.
    Matsushita H; Watanabe K; Yokoi T; Wakatsuki A
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1912-7. PubMed ID: 24964925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgery by consultant gynecologic oncologists improves survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma.
    Engelen MJ; Kos HE; Willemse PH; Aalders JG; de Vries EG; Schaapveld M; Otter R; van der Zee AG
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(3):589-98. PubMed ID: 16369985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synoptic Reporting for Pretreatment CT Examination in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Impact on Documentation of Disease Sites and Physician Satisfaction.
    Andrieu PC; Nikolovski I; Juluru K; Sadowski E; Gangai N; Zheng J; Capanu M; Praiss AM; Nougaret S; Shinagare AB; Ma W; Torrisi JM; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Lakhman Y;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):760-772. PubMed ID: 37436033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography.
    Bristow RE; Duska LR; Lambrou NC; Fishman EK; O'Neill MJ; Trimble EL; Montz FJ
    Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(7):1532-40. PubMed ID: 11013368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
    Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structured Reporting of Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Primary Rectal Cancer: Potential Benefits for Surgical Planning and Interdisciplinary Communication.
    Nörenberg D; Sommer WH; Thasler W; DʼHaese J; Rentsch M; Kolben T; Schreyer A; Rist C; Reiser M; Armbruster M
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):232-239. PubMed ID: 27861230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging developed by the SAR Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and the ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Working Group.
    Shinagare AB; Sadowski EA; Park H; Brook OR; Forstner R; Wallace SK; Horowitz JM; Horowitz N; Javitt M; Jha P; Kido A; Lakhman Y; Lee SI; Manganaro L; Maturen KE; Nougaret S; Poder L; Rauch GM; Reinhold C; Sala E; Thomassin-Naggara I; Vargas HA; Venkatesan A; Nikolic O; Rockall AG
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3220-3235. PubMed ID: 34846566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
    Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk for malignant and borderline ovarian neoplasms following basic preoperative evaluation by ultrasonography, ca125 level and age.
    Karadag B; Kocak M; Kayikcioglu F; Ercan F; Dilbaz B; Kose M; Haberal A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(19):8489-93. PubMed ID: 25339052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.