These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30821287)

  • 1. Plantar pressure analysis of above-knee amputee with a developed microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee.
    Cao W; Yu H; Meng Q; Chen W; Li S
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 30821287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
    Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
    Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
    Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiological parameters analysis of transfemoral amputees with different prosthetic knees.
    Li S; Cao W; Yu H; Meng Q; Chen W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 31798017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.
    Abdulhasan ZM; Scally AJ; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():35-41. PubMed ID: 29908391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
    Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foot trajectories and loading rates in a transfemoral amputee for six different commercial prosthetic knees: An indication of adaptability.
    Abouhossein A; Awad MI; Maqbool HF; Crisp C; Stewart TD; Messenger N; Richardson RC; Dehghani-Sanij AA; Bradley D
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jun; 68():46-56. PubMed ID: 30979583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
    Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pilot study of the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee with a novel hydraulic damper.
    Zhang Y; Cao W; Yu H; Meng Q; Chen W
    Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 31476188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee across varying walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
    Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Sveinsdóttir HS; Prins MR; van der Meer F; Koopman HFJM; Rietman JS
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():254-260. PubMed ID: 27838569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
    Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of ladder parameters on asymmetric patterns of force exertion during below-knee amputees climbing ladders.
    Li W; Li S; Fu Y; Chen J
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2017 Mar; 23(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 27231803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
    Struchkov V; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
    Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional gait analysis of trans-femoral amputees using two different single-axis prosthetic knees with hydraulic swing-phase control: Kinematic and kinetic comparison of two prosthetic knees.
    Sapin E; Goujon H; de Almeida F; Fodé P; Lavaste F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Jun; 32(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 18569888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees.
    Hof AL; van Bockel RM; Schoppen T; Postema K
    Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 16740390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee on planned gait termination.
    Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Koopman BF; Rietman JS
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1254-1259. PubMed ID: 28813993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centre of pressure displacements in trans-femoral amputees during gait.
    Schmid M; Beltrami G; Zambarbieri D; Verni G
    Gait Posture; 2005 Apr; 21(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 15760740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative biomechanical analysis of current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints.
    Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Blumentritt S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 91(4):644-52. PubMed ID: 20382300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.
    Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Ludwigs E; Blumentritt S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 93(3):541-9. PubMed ID: 22373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.