These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30821291)

  • 1. Evaluation of the retention characteristics of various stud attachment systems for implant retained overdenture.
    Gonuldas F; Tokar E; Ozturk C
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(4):135-141. PubMed ID: 30821291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of implant angulation and patrice on the retention of overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study.
    Frantz K; Funkenbusch P; Feng C; Tsigarida A; Chochlidakis K; Lo Russo L; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):452-459. PubMed ID: 37212388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Low-Profile Stud Attachment Configurations on Stress Distribution Characteristics of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):754-763. PubMed ID: 30024990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dislodgement force analysis of an overdenture attachment system.
    Yilmaz B; Ozkir E; Johnston WM; McGlumphy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):291-298. PubMed ID: 31202554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Vitro Evaluation of the Retentive Effectiveness of Axial Attachments Used in Implant-Retained Overdentures After 1 Year of Function.
    Chávarri-Prado D; Brizuela-Velasco A; Diéguez-Pereira M; Chento-Valiente Y; Estrada-Martínez A; Pérez-Pevida E; Álvarez-Arenal Á
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):556-562. PubMed ID: 35727248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture.
    Hegazy SA; El Mekawy N; Emera RMK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 32769276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.
    Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):487.e1-487.e12. PubMed ID: 35934574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The
    Kurtulus IL; Gurbulak AG
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):639-644. PubMed ID: 29735866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro measurement of the retention force of two stud attachment systems during cyclic load.
    Friedrichsen M; Dirksen D; Runte C
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 36779671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retentive force variations of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Boulos PJ; Akiki LA; Makzoumé JE; Fakhoury J; Tohmé H; El Hage FS
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):41-45. PubMed ID: 29964247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.