These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30822007)

  • 1. Experimental Reconstruction of Entanglement Quasiprobabilities.
    Sperling J; Meyer-Scott E; Barkhofen S; Brecht B; Silberhorn C
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Feb; 122(5):053602. PubMed ID: 30822007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct sampling of negative quasiprobabilities of a squeezed state.
    Kiesel T; Vogel W; Hage B; Schnabel R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Sep; 107(11):113604. PubMed ID: 22026668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental determination of entanglement with a single measurement.
    Walborn SP; Souto Ribeiro PH; Davidovich L; Mintert F; Buchleitner A
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):1022-4. PubMed ID: 16625190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multistage entanglement swapping.
    Goebel AM; Wagenknecht C; Zhang Q; Chen YA; Chen K; Schmiedmayer J; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Aug; 101(8):080403. PubMed ID: 18764594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Construction of an optimal witness for unknown two-qubit entanglement.
    Park HS; Lee SS; Kim H; Choi SK; Sim HS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Dec; 105(23):230404. PubMed ID: 21231433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Most general class of quasiprobability distributions of work.
    Francica G
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Nov; 106(5-1):054129. PubMed ID: 36559350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demonstration of quantum entanglement between a single electron spin confined to an InAs quantum dot and a photon.
    Schaibley JR; Burgers AP; McCracken GA; Duan LM; Berman PR; Steel DG; Bracker AS; Gammon D; Sham LJ
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Apr; 110(16):167401. PubMed ID: 23679636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full characterization of a three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state using quantum state tomography.
    Resch KJ; Walther P; Zeilinger A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Feb; 94(7):070402. PubMed ID: 15783791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disproving the Peres conjecture by showing Bell nonlocality from bound entanglement.
    Vértesi T; Brunner N
    Nat Commun; 2014 Nov; 5():5297. PubMed ID: 25370352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Certifying Nonclassical Behavior for Negative Keldysh Quasiprobabilities.
    Potts PP
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Mar; 122(11):110401. PubMed ID: 30951341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive test of entanglement for two-level systems via the indeterminacy relationship.
    Yu S; Pan JW; Chen ZB; Zhang YD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Nov; 91(21):217903. PubMed ID: 14683337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using separable Bell-diagonal states to distribute entanglement.
    Kay A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(8):080503. PubMed ID: 23002729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating Outcome Probabilities of Quantum Circuits Using Quasiprobabilities.
    Pashayan H; Wallman JJ; Bartlett SD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Aug; 115(7):070501. PubMed ID: 26317701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamics of entanglement in quantum computers with imperfections.
    Montangero S; Benenti G; Fazio R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Oct; 91(18):187901. PubMed ID: 14611314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Entanglement distillation between solid-state quantum network nodes.
    Kalb N; Reiserer AA; Humphreys PC; Bakermans JJW; Kamerling SJ; Nickerson NH; Benjamin SC; Twitchen DJ; Markham M; Hanson R
    Science; 2017 Jun; 356(6341):928-932. PubMed ID: 28572386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bell-type inequalities for partial separability in N-particle systems and quantum mechanical violations.
    Seevinck M; Svetlichny G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Aug; 89(6):060401. PubMed ID: 12190567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Convex Optimization over Classes of Multiparticle Entanglement.
    Shang J; Gühne O
    Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Feb; 120(5):050506. PubMed ID: 29481200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heralded high-efficiency quantum repeater with atomic ensembles assisted by faithful single-photon transmission.
    Li T; Deng FG
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15610. PubMed ID: 26502993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting quantum errors with entanglement.
    Brun T; Devetak I; Hsieh MH
    Science; 2006 Oct; 314(5798):436-9. PubMed ID: 17008489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Witnessing entanglement without entanglement witness operators.
    Pezzè L; Li Y; Li W; Smerzi A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Oct; 113(41):11459-11464. PubMed ID: 27681625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.