These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30822143)

  • 1. Significance Tests and Estimates for
    van Ginkel JR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(4):514-529. PubMed ID: 30822143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for [Formula: see text] in Multiply Imputed Data.
    van Ginkel JR
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):185-205. PubMed ID: 32162232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for significance testing of categorical covariates in logistic regression models after multiple imputation: power and applicability analysis.
    Eekhout I; van de Wiel MA; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 28830466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Holder RL; Royston P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jul; 9():57. PubMed ID: 19638200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variable selection for multiply-imputed data with application to dioxin exposure study.
    Chen Q; Wang S
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(21):3646-59. PubMed ID: 23526243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pooling test statistics across multiply imputed datasets for nonnormal items.
    Jia F
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1229-1243. PubMed ID: 36973636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combination rules for homoscedastic and heteroscedastic MANOVA models from multiply imputed datasets.
    Vallejo G; Fernández MP; Rosário P
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):669-685. PubMed ID: 32804343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data?
    Wood AM; White IR; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3227-46. PubMed ID: 18203127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development and validation of prognostic models for overall survival in the presence of missing data in the training dataset: a strategy with a detailed example.
    Royle KL; Cairns DA
    Diagn Progn Res; 2021 Aug; 5(1):14. PubMed ID: 34344484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the fit of structural equation models with multiply imputed data.
    Enders CK; Mansolf M
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):76-93. PubMed ID: 27893216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple pooling method for variable selection in multiply imputed datasets outperformed complex methods.
    Panken AM; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):214. PubMed ID: 35927610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of test accuracy studies using imputation for partial reporting of multiple thresholds.
    Ensor J; Deeks JJ; Martin EC; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):100-115. PubMed ID: 29052347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of different measures of the proportion of explained variance in multiply imputed data sets.
    van Ginkel JR; Karch JD
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Nov; 77(3):672-693. PubMed ID: 38578020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multivariate outlier detection applied to multiply imputed laboratory data.
    Penny KI; Jolliffe IT
    Stat Med; 1999 Jul; 18(14):1879-95; dicussion 1897. PubMed ID: 10407259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The estimation and use of predictions for the assessment of model performance using large samples with multiply imputed data.
    Wood AM; Royston P; White IR
    Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):614-32. PubMed ID: 25630926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of Variance of Multiply Imputed Data.
    van Ginkel JR; Kroonenberg PM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014 Jan; 49(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 24860197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference following multiple imputation for generalized additive models: an investigation of the median p-value rule with applications to the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry and Colorado COVID-19 hospitalization data.
    Bolt MA; MaWhinney S; Pattee JW; Erlandson KM; Badesch DB; Peterson RA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):148. PubMed ID: 35597908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Averaging dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: a cautionary note about procedures.
    Marín-Martínez F; Sánchez-Meca J
    Span J Psychol; 1999 May; 2(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 11757259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of imputation variance estimators.
    Hughes RA; Sterne J; Tilling K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2541-2557. PubMed ID: 24682265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covariate Selection for Multilevel Models with Missing Data.
    Marino M; Buxton OM; Li Y
    Stat (Int Stat Inst); 2017; 6(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 28239457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.