161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30822144)
1. User experience and operational feasibility of four point-of-collection oral fluid drug-testing devices according to Brazilian traffic agents.
Pechansky F; Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Roglio V; Telles YM; Silvestrin R; Pasa G; Sousa T
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30822144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical reliability of four oral fluid point-of-collection testing devices for drug detection in drivers.
Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Rabelo-da-Ponte FD; Silvestrin R; Ornell R; Sousa T; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110434. PubMed ID: 32758788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.
Musshoff F; Hokamp EG; Bott U; Madea B
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():120-4. PubMed ID: 24699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opioids in oral fluid of Spanish drivers.
Herrera-Gómez F; García-Mingo M; Colás M; González-Luque JC; Álvarez FJ
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Jun; 187():35-39. PubMed ID: 29626744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A field test of substance use screening devices as part of routine drunk-driving spot detection operating procedures in South Africa.
Matzopoulos R; Lasarow A; Bowman B
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():118-24. PubMed ID: 23770390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood.
Edwards LD; Smith KL; Savage T
J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 28830121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing drug detection in oral fluid and blood: data from a national sample of nighttime drivers.
Kelley-Baker T; Moore C; Lacey JH; Yao J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 24345011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.
Pehrsson A; Gunnar T; Engblom C; Seppä H; Jama A; Lillsunde P
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):140-8. PubMed ID: 17640837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of on-site oral fluid screening using Drugwipe-5(+), RapidSTAT and Drug Test 5000 for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.
Wille SM; Samyn N; Ramírez-Fernández Mdel M; De Boeck G
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 May; 198(1-3):2-6. PubMed ID: 19913376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field testing of the Alere DDS2 Mobile Test System for drugs in oral fluid.
Moore C; Kelley-Baker T; Lacey J
J Anal Toxicol; 2013 Jun; 37(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 23558436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Roadside drug testing: An evaluation of the Alere DDS
Rohrig TP; Moore CM; Stephens K; Cooper K; Coulter C; Baird T; Garnier M; Miller S; Tuyay J; Osawa K; Chou J; Nuss C; Collier J; Wittman KC
Drug Test Anal; 2018 Apr; 10(4):663-670. PubMed ID: 28879663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory evaluation and field application of roadside oral fluid collectors and drug testing devices.
Crouch DJ; Walsh JM; Cangianelli L; Quintela O
Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 18367979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Roadside Drug Testing Approaches.
Alhefeiti MA; Barker J; Shah I
Molecules; 2021 May; 26(11):. PubMed ID: 34072538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and prevalence of drug use in arrested drivers using the Dräger Drug Test 5000 and Affiniton DrugWipe oral fluid drug screening devices.
Logan BK; Mohr AL; Talpins SK
J Anal Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 38(7):444-50. PubMed ID: 24894458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Driving under the influence of cannabis: pitfalls, validation, and quality control of a UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid collected with StatSure, Quantisal, or Certus collector.
Wille SM; Di Fazio V; Ramírez-Fernandez Mdel M; Kummer N; Samyn N
Ther Drug Monit; 2013 Feb; 35(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 23318281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of four oral fluid devices (DDS®, Drugtest 5000®, Drugwipe 5+® and RapidSTAT®) for on-site monitoring drugged driving in comparison with UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
Strano-Rossi S; Castrignanò E; Anzillotti L; Serpelloni G; Mollica R; Tagliaro F; Pascali JP; di Stefano D; Sgalla R; Chiarotti M
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):70-6. PubMed ID: 22554872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral fluid testing for driving under the influence of drugs: history, recent progress and remaining challenges.
Verstraete AG
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jun; 150(2-3):143-50. PubMed ID: 15944054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of drugs in oral fluid from truck drivers in Brazilian highways.
Bombana HS; Gjerde H; Dos Santos MF; Jamt REG; Yonamine M; Rohlfs WJC; Muñoz DR; Leyton V
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Apr; 273():140-143. PubMed ID: 28273545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral fluid as an alternative matrix to determine ethanol for forensic purposes.
Bueno LHP; da Silva RHA; Azenha AV; de Souza Dias MC; De Martinis BS
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Sep; 242():117-122. PubMed ID: 25047219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral fluid testing for marijuana intoxication: enhancing objectivity for roadside DUI testing.
Doucette ML; Frattaroli S; Vernick JS
Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 24(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 28572268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
