161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30822144)
21. Correlation of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations determined by LC-MS-MS in oral fluid and plasma from impaired drivers and evaluation of the on-site Dräger DrugTest.
Laloup M; Del Mar Ramirez Fernandez M; Wood M; De Boeck G; Maes V; Samyn N
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Sep; 161(2-3):175-9. PubMed ID: 16842950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening for drugs in oral fluid: illicit drug use and drug driving in a sample of Queensland motorists.
Davey J; Leal N; Freeman J
Drug Alcohol Rev; 2007 May; 26(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 17454020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Drugs and driving: the Finnish perspective.
Lillsunde P; Gunnar T
Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):213-29. PubMed ID: 21338023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of Oral Fluid as a Specimen for DUID.
Veitenheimer AM; Wagner JR
J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):517-522. PubMed ID: 28633318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Screening for drugs in oral fluid: drug driving and illicit drug use in a sample of Queensland motorists.
Davey J; Freeman J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Jun; 10(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19452364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Oral fluid collection: the neglected variable in oral fluid testing.
Crouch DJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jun; 150(2-3):165-73. PubMed ID: 15899565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection of cannabis use in drivers with the drugwipe device and by GC-MS after Intercept device collection.
Kintz P; Bernhard W; Villain M; Gasser M; Aebi B; Cirimele V
J Anal Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 29(7):724-7. PubMed ID: 16419408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Introduction and review of collection techniques and applications of drug testing of oral fluid.
Drummer OH
Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 18367981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detecting alcohol and illicit drugs in oral fluid samples collected from truck drivers in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.
Yonamine M; Sanches LR; Paranhos BA; de Almeida RM; Andreuccetti G; Leyton V
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 23343020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Victorian legislative framework for the random testing drivers at the roadside for the presence of illicit drugs: an evaluation of the characteristics of drivers detected from 2004 to 2006.
Boorman M; Owens K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Mar; 10(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19214873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analytical techniques for drug detection in oral fluid.
Lillsunde P
Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 18367978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Current developments in drug testing in oral fluid.
Pil K; Verstraete A
Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 18367980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Oral Fluid Testing for Cocaine: Analytical Evaluation of Two Point-of-Collection Drug Screening Devices.
Scherer JN; Fiorentin TR; Sousa TRV; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jun; 41(5):392-398. PubMed ID: 28334841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analytical evaluation of four on-site oral fluid drug testing devices.
Vanstechelman S; Isalberti C; Van der Linden T; Pil K; Legrand SA; Verstraete AG
J Anal Toxicol; 2012 Mar; 36(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 22337784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Supported liquid extraction (SLE) for the analysis of methylamphetamine, methylenedioxymethylamphetamine and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid and blood of drivers.
Rositano J; Harpas P; Kostakis C; Scott T
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Aug; 265():125-30. PubMed ID: 26878366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of RapidSTAT®, DrugWipe® 6S, DrugScreen® 5TK and DrugScreen® 7TR for on-site drug testing in German police roadside traffic patrol.
Liut J; Bott U; Madea B; Krämer M; Maas A
Drug Test Anal; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1407-1416. PubMed ID: 35343088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Confirmation by LC-MS of drugs in oral fluid obtained from roadside testing.
Concheiro M; de Castro A; Quintela O; Cruz A; López-Rivadulla M
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):156-62. PubMed ID: 17658709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of Dräger DrugTest 5000 in a Naturalistic Setting.
Gjerde H; Clausen GB; Andreassen E; Furuhaugen H
J Anal Toxicol; 2018 May; 42(4):248-254. PubMed ID: 29409046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are oral fluid testing devices effective for the roadside detection of recent cannabis use? A systematic review.
Dobri SCD; Moslehi AH; Davies TC
Public Health; 2019 Jun; 171():57-65. PubMed ID: 31102828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The prevalence of alcohol and drugs in sampled oral fluid is related to sample volume.
Gjerde H; Normann PT; Christophersen AS
J Anal Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 34(7):416-9. PubMed ID: 20822680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
