211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30822146)
21. Patients' perceptions of using artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology to comprehend radiology imaging data.
Zhang Z; Citardi D; Wang D; Genc Y; Shan J; Fan X
Health Informatics J; 2021; 27(2):14604582211011215. PubMed ID: 33913359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Health Message Generation: The Folic Acid Message Engine.
Schmälzle R; Wilcox S
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28858. PubMed ID: 35040800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An experimental study to examine whether and how Flemish and Dutch harm prevention messages on gambling advertising affect consumers' gambling-related beliefs and intentions.
De Jans S; Cauberghe V; Hudders L; Rys F
Psychol Addict Behav; 2023 Sep; 37(6):771-784. PubMed ID: 37668565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How Should AI Be Developed, Validated, and Implemented in Patient Care?
Anderson M; Anderson SL
AMA J Ethics; 2019 Feb; 21(2):E125-130. PubMed ID: 30794121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of family history on cognitive heuristics, risk perceptions, and prostate cancer screening behavior.
McDowell ME; Occhipinti S; Chambers SK
Health Psychol; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1158-69. PubMed ID: 23527518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The ethical, legal and social implications of using artificial intelligence systems in breast cancer care.
Carter SM; Rogers W; Win KT; Frazer H; Richards B; Houssami N
Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():25-32. PubMed ID: 31677530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimizing Tailored Communications for Health Risk Assessment: A Randomized Factorial Experiment of the Effects of Expectancy Priming, Autonomy Support, and Exemplification.
Valle CG; Queen TL; Martin BA; Ribisl KM; Mayer DK; Tate DF
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e63. PubMed ID: 29496652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Artificial Intelligence and Persuasion: A Construal-Level Account.
Kim TW; Duhachek A
Psychol Sci; 2020 Apr; 31(4):363-380. PubMed ID: 32223692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effects of Gain-, Loss-, and Balanced-Framed Messages for Preventing Indoor Tanning among Young Adult Women.
Mays D; Evans WD
J Health Commun; 2017 Jul; 22(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 28598730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Do you want the good news or the bad news? Gain- versus loss-framed messages following health risk information: The effects on leisure time physical activity beliefs and cognitions.
Bassett-Gunter RL; Martin Ginis KA; Latimer-Cheung AE
Health Psychol; 2013 Dec; 32(12):1188-98. PubMed ID: 23088175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening: Opportunity or hype?
Houssami N; Lee CI; Buist DSM; Tao D
Breast; 2017 Dec; 36():31-33. PubMed ID: 28938172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. AI-based smartphone apps for risk assessment of skin cancer need more evaluation and better regulation.
Matin RN; Dinnes J
Br J Cancer; 2021 May; 124(11):1749-1750. PubMed ID: 33742148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of Website Interactivity on Skin Cancer-Related Intentions and User Experience: Factorial Randomized Experiment.
Niu Z; Willoughby JF; Coups EJ; Stapleton JL
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e18299. PubMed ID: 33439131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Scientific Message Translation and the Heuristic Systematic Model: Insights for Designing Educational Messages About Progesterone and Breast Cancer Risks.
Hitt R; Perrault E; Smith S; Keating DM; Nazione S; Silk K; Russell J
J Cancer Educ; 2016 Jun; 31(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 25903053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinicians' perceptions of the benefits and harms of prostate and colorectal cancer screening.
Elstad EA; Sutkowi-Hemstreet A; Sheridan SL; Vu M; Harris R; Reyna VF; Rini C; Earp JA; Brewer NT
Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 25637592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting Vaccination Intention and Benefit and Risk Perceptions: The Incorporation of Affect, Trust, and Television Influence in a Dual-Mode Model.
Chen NT
Risk Anal; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1268-80. PubMed ID: 25808562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does message framing affect changes in behavioural intentions in people with psoriasis? A randomized exploratory study examining health risk communication.
Keyworth C; Nelson PA; Bundy C; Pye SR; Griffiths CEM; Cordingley L
Psychol Health Med; 2018 Aug; 23(7):763-778. PubMed ID: 29380626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. When Artificial Intelligence Voices Human Concerns: The Paradoxical Effects of AI Voice on Climate Risk Perception and Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention.
Ni B; Wu F; Huang Q
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36834467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: a Markov decision process approach.
Bennett CC; Hauser K
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jan; 57(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 23287490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin-cancer detection.
van 't Riet J; Ruiter RA; Werrij MQ; De Vries H
Psychol Health; 2010 Mar; 25(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 20204928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
