182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30823388)
1. Health Benefits from Upgrading Public Buses for Cleaner Air: A Case Study of Clark County, Nevada and the United States.
Olawepo JO; Chen LA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30823388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exposure to BTEX in buses: The influence of vehicle fuel type.
Fontes T; Manso MC; Prata JC; Carvalho M; Silva C; Barros N
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113100. PubMed ID: 31542674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emissions of toxic pollutants from compressed natural gas and low sulfur diesel-fueled heavy-duty transit buses tested over multiple driving cycles.
Kado NY; Okamoto RA; Kuzmicky PA; Kobayashi R; Ayala A; Gebel ME; Rieger PL; Maddox C; Zafonte L
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(19):7638-49. PubMed ID: 16245838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrafine PM emissions from natural gas, oxidation-catalyst diesel, and particle-trap diesel heavy-duty transit buses.
Holmén BA; Ayala A
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Dec; 36(23):5041-50. PubMed ID: 12523418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-use fuel economy of hybrid-electric school buses in Iowa.
Hallmark S; Sperry B; Mudgal A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21608490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion charging measurements on exhaust solid particle number and lung deposited surface area of compressed natural gas and diesel buses.
Eisazadeh H; Ehteram MA; Khazaee I
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(14):16929-16939. PubMed ID: 32144706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clean fleets, different streets: evaluating the effect of New York City's clean bus program on changes to estimated ambient air pollution.
Lovasi GS; Treat CA; Fry D; Shah I; Clougherty JE; Berberian A; Perera FP; Kioumourtzoglou MA
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2023 May; 33(3):332-338. PubMed ID: 35906405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrification of Transit Buses in the United States Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Martinez SS; Samaras C
Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 58(9):4137-4144. PubMed ID: 38373231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unregulated emissions from compressed natural gas (CNG) transit buses configured with and without oxidation catalyst.
Okamoto RA; Kado NY; Kuzmicky PA; Ayala A; Kobayashi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):332-41. PubMed ID: 16433369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-vehicle measurement of ultrafine particles on compressed natural gas, conventional diesel, and oxidation-catalyst diesel heavy-duty transit buses.
Hammond D; Jones S; Lalor M
Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Feb; 125(1-3):239-46. PubMed ID: 17219245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exposure assessment of diesel bus emissions.
Yip M; Madl P; Wiegand A; Hofmann W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2006 Dec; 3(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 17159271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Air quality and climate impacts of alternative bus technologies in Greater London.
Chong U; Yim SH; Barrett SR; Boies AM
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(8):4613-22. PubMed ID: 24654768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adopting electric school buses in the United States: Health and climate benefits.
Choma EF; Robinson LA; Nadeau KC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(22):e2320338121. PubMed ID: 38768355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fuels for urban transit buses: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cohen JT; Hammitt JK; Levy JI
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Apr; 37(8):1477-84. PubMed ID: 12731827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fresh and Oxidized Emissions from In-Use Transit Buses Running on Diesel, Biodiesel, and CNG.
Watne ÅK; Psichoudaki M; Ljungström E; Le Breton M; Hallquist M; Jerksjö M; Fallgren H; Jutterström S; Hallquist ÅM
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 52(14):7720-7728. PubMed ID: 29894174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits of near-zero freight: The air quality and health impacts of low-NO
Mac Kinnon M; Zhu S; Cervantes A; Dabdub D; Samuelsen GS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Nov; 71(11):1428-1444. PubMed ID: 34287106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of emissions from vehicles fueled with diesel or compressed natural gas.
Hesterberg TW; Lapin CA; Bunn WB
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Sep; 42(17):6437-45. PubMed ID: 18800512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emission Standards, Public Transit, and Infant Health.
Ngo NS
J Policy Anal Manage; 2017; 36(4):773-89. PubMed ID: 28991422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exposure assessment of particulates of diesel and natural gas fuelled buses in silico.
Pietikäinen M; Oravisjärvi K; Rautio A; Voutilainen A; Ruuskanen J; Keiski RL
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 19828175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Particle and gaseous emissions from compressed natural gas and ultralow sulphur diesel-fuelled buses at four steady engine loads.
Jayaratne ER; Ristovski ZD; Meyer N; Morawska L
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr; 407(8):2845-52. PubMed ID: 19185331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
