155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30823956)
1. Comparison of Outcomes between Fractional-Flow-Reserveand Angiography-Directed Intervention in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Jianjun Y; Xiaohua P; Xuemei T; Gang H; Hailong W
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2019 Mar; 29(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 30823956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kanaji Y; Usui E; Hoshino M; Hada M; Hamaya R; Kanno Y; Lee T; Kakuta T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(6):1063-1074. PubMed ID: 29446567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes.
Kasula S; Agarwal SK; Hacioglu Y; Pothineni NK; Bhatti S; Ahmed Z; Uretsky B; Hakeem A
Heart; 2016 Dec; 102(24):1988-1994. PubMed ID: 27492942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines).
Smilowitz NR; Mahajan AM; Roe MT; Hellkamp AS; Chiswell K; Gulati M; Reynolds HR
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):e003443. PubMed ID: 29246884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.
Collison D; McClure JD; Berry C; Oldroyd KG
Clin Cardiol; 2020 May; 43(5):414-422. PubMed ID: 32037592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE-ACS Observational Study.
Ibrahim H; Sharma PK; Cohen DJ; Fonarow GC; Kaltenbach LA; Effron MB; Zettler ME; Peterson ED; Wang TY
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 28982673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting).
Meneveau N; Souteyrand G; Motreff P; Caussin C; Amabile N; Ohlmann P; Morel O; Lefrançois Y; Descotes-Genon V; Silvain J; Braik N; Chopard R; Chatot M; Ecarnot F; Tauzin H; Van Belle E; Belle L; Schiele F
Circulation; 2016 Sep; 134(13):906-17. PubMed ID: 27573032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of optimal timing of coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Barbarawi M; Kheiri B; Zayed Y; Barbarawi O; Chahine A; Haykal T; Kanugula AK; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Bhatt DL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 31111670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of Initial Revascularization Versus Medical Therapy Alone in Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing an Invasive Strategy.
Wijeysundera HC; Sidhu MS; Bennell MC; Qiu F; Ko DT; Knudtson ML; Tu JV; Boden WE
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 27418612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS): evaluation of the new risk stratification in the NSTEACS European guidelines.
Martinón-Martínez J; Álvarez Álvarez B; González Ferrero T; García-Rodeja Arias F; Otero García Ó; Cacho Antonio C; Abou Jokh Casas C; Zuazola P; Cordero A; Escribano D; Cid Alvarez B; Iglesias Álvarez D; Agra Bermejo R; Rigueiro Veloso P; García Acuña JM; Gude Sampedro F; González Juanatey JR
Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 110(9):1464-1472. PubMed ID: 33687519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of comorbidities and gender on the use of coronary interventions in patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Worrall-Carter L; McEvedy S; Wilson A; Rahman MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87(4):E128-36. PubMed ID: 26277889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical effect of selective interventional therapy on sub-acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction under the guidance of fractional flow reserve and coronary arteriography.
Wang BJ; Geng J; Li QJ; Hu TT; Xu B; Ma SR
Eur J Med Res; 2018 May; 23(1):27. PubMed ID: 29793533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and safety outcomes of fractional flow reserve in guiding clinical therapy of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with angiography alone in elderly Chinese patients.
Zhang Z; Li K; Tian J
Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():1751-1754. PubMed ID: 27932871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Timing of Coronary Invasive Strategy in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes and Clinical Outcomes: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Bonello L; Laine M; Puymirat E; Lemesle G; Thuny F; Paganelli F; Michelet P; Roch A; Kerbaul F; Boyer L
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(22):2267-2276. PubMed ID: 27884352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association between angiographic complications and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an EARLY ACS (Early Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) angiographic substudy.
Pride YB; Mohanavelu S; Zorkun C; Kunadian V; Giugliano RP; Newby LK; Braunwald E; Califf RM; Harrington RA; Gibson CM;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Sep; 5(9):927-35. PubMed ID: 22995880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Invasive Versus Medical Management in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With a Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Lee MMY; Petrie MC; Rocchiccioli P; Simpson J; Jackson CE; Corcoran DS; Mangion K; Brown A; Cialdella P; Sidik NP; McEntegart MB; Shaukat A; Rae AP; Hood SHM; Peat EE; Findlay IN; Murphy CL; Cormack AJ; Bukov NB; Balachandran KP; Oldroyd KG; Ford I; Wu O; McConnachie A; Barry SJE; Berry C;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 12(8):e007830. PubMed ID: 31362541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
