These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30824707)
1. A multi-task convolutional deep neural network for variant calling in single molecule sequencing. Luo R; Sedlazeck FJ; Lam TW; Schatz MC Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):998. PubMed ID: 30824707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Poplin R; Chang PC; Alexander D; Schwartz S; Colthurst T; Ku A; Newburger D; Dijamco J; Nguyen N; Afshar PT; Gross SS; Dorfman L; McLean CY; DePristo MA Nat Biotechnol; 2018 Nov; 36(10):983-987. PubMed ID: 30247488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clair3-trio: high-performance Nanopore long-read variant calling in family trios with trio-to-trio deep neural networks. Su J; Zheng Z; Ahmed SS; Lam TW; Luo R Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35849103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HELLO: improved neural network architectures and methodologies for small variant calling. Ramachandran A; Lumetta SS; Klee EW; Chen D BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):404. PubMed ID: 34391391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Future of Livestock Management: A Review of Real-Time Portable Sequencing Applied to Livestock. Lamb HJ; Hayes BJ; Nguyen LT; Ross EM Genes (Basel); 2020 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 33317066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NanoSNP: a progressive and haplotype-aware SNP caller on low-coverage nanopore sequencing data. Huang N; Xu M; Nie F; Ni P; Xiao CL; Luo F; Wang J Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36548365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fast and sensitive mapping of nanopore sequencing reads with GraphMap. Sović I; Šikić M; Wilm A; Fenlon SN; Chen S; Nagarajan N Nat Commun; 2016 Apr; 7():11307. PubMed ID: 27079541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ARAMIS: From systematic errors of NGS long reads to accurate assemblies. Sacristán-Horcajada E; González-de la Fuente S; Peiró-Pastor R; Carrasco-Ramiro F; Amils R; Requena JM; Berenguer J; Aguado B Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34013348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Haplotype-aware variant calling with PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant enables high accuracy in nanopore long-reads. Shafin K; Pesout T; Chang PC; Nattestad M; Kolesnikov A; Goel S; Baid G; Kolmogorov M; Eizenga JM; Miga KH; Carnevali P; Jain M; Carroll A; Paten B Nat Methods; 2021 Nov; 18(11):1322-1332. PubMed ID: 34725481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data. Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA; Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 16GT: a fast and sensitive variant caller using a 16-genotype probabilistic model. Luo R; Schatz MC; Salzberg SL Gigascience; 2017 Jul; 6(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 28637275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CoVaCS: a consensus variant calling system. Chiara M; Gioiosa S; Chillemi G; D'Antonio M; Flati T; Picardi E; Zambelli F; Horner DS; Pesole G; Castrignanò T BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29402227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNAscent v2: detecting replication forks in nanopore sequencing data with deep learning. Boemo MA BMC Genomics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):430. PubMed ID: 34107894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring single-sample SNP and INDEL calling with whole-genome de novo assembly. Li H Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 28(14):1838-44. PubMed ID: 22569178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lean and deep models for more accurate filtering of SNP and INDEL variant calls. Friedman S; Gauthier L; Farjoun Y; Banks E Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2060-2067. PubMed ID: 31830260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discovery and genotyping of novel sequence insertions in many sequenced individuals. Kavak P; Lin YY; Numanagic I; Asghari H; Güngör T; Alkan C; Hach F Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):i161-i169. PubMed ID: 28881988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens. Bogaerts B; Van den Bossche A; Verhaegen B; Delbrassinne L; Mattheus W; Nouws S; Godfroid M; Hoffman S; Roosens NHC; De Keersmaecker SCJ; Vanneste K J Clin Microbiol; 2024 May; 62(5):e0157623. PubMed ID: 38441926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic Pooling Improves Nanopore Base Calling Accuracy. Boza V; Peresini P; Brejova B; Vinar T IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(6):3416-3424. PubMed ID: 34784283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The new sequencer on the block: comparison of Life Technology's Proton sequencer to an Illumina HiSeq for whole-exome sequencing. Boland JF; Chung CC; Roberson D; Mitchell J; Zhang X; Im KM; He J; Chanock SJ; Yeager M; Dean M Hum Genet; 2013 Oct; 132(10):1153-63. PubMed ID: 23757002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]