These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30824827)

  • 1. Tightening Monogamy and Polygamy Inequalities of Multiqubit Entanglement.
    Farooq A; Ur Rehman J; Jeong Y; Kim JS; Shin H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3314. PubMed ID: 30824827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tighter Constraints of Multi-Qubit Entanglement in Terms of Nonconvex Entanglement Measures LCREN and LCRENoA.
    Shen Z; Xuan D; Zhou W; Wang Z; Fei SM
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 Jan; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 38392382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unified Monogamy Relations of Multipartite Entanglement.
    Khan A; Ur Rehman J; Wang K; Shin H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16419. PubMed ID: 31712571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems.
    Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monogamy relation of multi-qubit systems for squared Tsallis-q entanglement.
    Yuan GM; Song W; Yang M; Li DC; Zhao JL; Cao ZL
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28719. PubMed ID: 27346605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalised monogamy relation of convex-roof extended negativity in multi-level systems.
    Tian T; Luo Y; Li Y
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36700. PubMed ID: 27857163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strong monogamy conjecture for multiqubit entanglement: the four-qubit case.
    Regula B; Di Martino S; Lee S; Adesso G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(11):110501. PubMed ID: 25259963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multipartite quantum entanglement evolution in photosynthetic complexes.
    Zhu J; Kais S; Aspuru-Guzik A; Rodriques S; Brock B; Love PJ
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Aug; 137(7):074112. PubMed ID: 22920108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: the Gaussian case.
    Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(15):150501. PubMed ID: 17995148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hamming weight and tight constraints of multi-qubit entanglement in terms of unified entropy.
    Kim JS
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12245. PubMed ID: 30115958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful?
    Lancien C; Di Martino S; Huber M; Piani M; Adesso G; Winter A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Aug; 117(6):060501. PubMed ID: 27541447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement.
    Osborne TJ; Verstraete F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jun; 96(22):220503. PubMed ID: 16803293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monogamy Inequality for Any Local Quantum Resource and Entanglement.
    Camalet S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Sep; 119(11):110503. PubMed ID: 28949199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are general quantum correlations monogamous?
    Streltsov A; Adesso G; Piani M; Bruss D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(5):050503. PubMed ID: 23006154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When Is a Genuine Multipartite Entanglement Measure Monogamous?
    Guo Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Entanglement monogamy in three qutrit systems.
    Li Q; Cui J; Wang S; Long GL
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1946. PubMed ID: 28512296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polynomial Monogamy Relations for Entanglement Negativity.
    Allen GW; Meyer DA
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Feb; 118(8):080402. PubMed ID: 28282169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear monogamy of entanglement in three-qubit systems.
    Liu F; Gao F; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16745. PubMed ID: 26568265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monogamy inequality for distributed gaussian entanglement.
    Hiroshima T; Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Feb; 98(5):050503. PubMed ID: 17358836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monogamy equalities for qubit entanglement from Lorentz invariance.
    Eltschka C; Siewert J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Apr; 114(14):140402. PubMed ID: 25910095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.