142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30824905)
1. Surrogate minimal depth as an importance measure for variables in random forests.
Seifert S; Gundlach S; Szymczak S
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3663-3671. PubMed ID: 30824905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploitation of surrogate variables in random forests for unbiased analysis of mutual impact and importance of features.
Voges LF; Jarren LC; Seifert S
Bioinformatics; 2023 Aug; 39(8):. PubMed ID: 37522865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets.
Degenhardt F; Seifert S; Szymczak S
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Mar; 20(2):492-503. PubMed ID: 29045534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The revival of the Gini importance?
Nembrini S; König IR; Wright MN
Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 34(21):3711-3718. PubMed ID: 29757357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opening the Random Forest Black Box of
Wenck S; Mix T; Fischer M; Hackl T; Seifert S
Metabolites; 2023 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37887402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Matched Forest: supervised learning for high-dimensional matched case-control studies.
Shomal Zadeh N; Lin S; Runger GC
Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(5):1570-1576. PubMed ID: 31621830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study becomes insight: Ecological learning from machine learning.
Yu Q; Ji W; Prihodko L; Ross CW; Anchang JY; Hanan NP
Methods Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 12(11):2117-2128. PubMed ID: 35874972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new approach for interpreting Random Forest models and its application to the biology of ageing.
Fabris F; Doherty A; Palmer D; de Magalhães JP; Freitas AA
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(14):2449-2456. PubMed ID: 29462247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A decision-theoretic approach to the evaluation of machine learning algorithms in computational drug discovery.
Watson OP; Cortes-Ciriano I; Taylor AR; Watson JA
Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(22):4656-4663. PubMed ID: 31070704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: variable selection and predictive performance.
Liu Y; Zhou S; Wei H; An S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 34563138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable selection and validation in multivariate modelling.
Shi L; Westerhuis JA; Rosén J; Landberg R; Brunius C
Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 35(6):972-980. PubMed ID: 30165467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution.
Strobl C; Boulesteix AL; Zeileis A; Hothorn T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 8():25. PubMed ID: 17254353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Knockoff boosted tree for model-free variable selection.
Jiang T; Li Y; Motsinger-Reif AA
Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(7):976-983. PubMed ID: 32966559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential privacy-based evaporative cooling feature selection and classification with relief-F and random forests.
Le TT; Simmons WK; Misaki M; Bodurka J; White BC; Savitz J; McKinney BA
Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(18):2906-2913. PubMed ID: 28472232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opening the Random Forest Black Box of the Metabolome by the Application of Surrogate Minimal Depth.
Wenck S; Creydt M; Hansen J; Gärber F; Fischer M; Seifert S
Metabolites; 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35050127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AutoDC: an automatic machine learning framework for disease classification.
Bai Y; Li Y; Shen Y; Yang M; Zhang W; Cui B
Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(13):3415-3421. PubMed ID: 35583303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Block Forests: random forests for blocks of clinical and omics covariate data.
Hornung R; Wright MN
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):358. PubMed ID: 31248362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RMTL: an R library for multi-task learning.
Cao H; Zhou J; Schwarz E
Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 35(10):1797-1798. PubMed ID: 30256897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
