These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30826109)

  • 1. Identifying decisions in optometry: A validation study of the decision identification and classification taxonomy for use in medicine (DICTUM) in optometric consultations.
    Sundling V; Stene HA; Eide H; Hugaas Ofstad E
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Jul; 102(7):1288-1295. PubMed ID: 30826109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study.
    Ofstad EH; Frich JC; Schei E; Frankel RM; Gulbrandsen P
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010098. PubMed ID: 26868946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between unwarranted variation in optometric referrals and time since qualification.
    Parkins DJ; Benwell MJ; Edgar DF; Evans BJW
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Sep; 38(5):550-561. PubMed ID: 30175473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.
    Elwyn G; Edwards A; Wensing M; Hood K; Atwell C; Grol R
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Apr; 12(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12679504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters: a cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy.
    Ofstad EH; Frich JC; Schei E; Frankel RM; Šaltytė Benth J; Gulbrandsen P
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e018042. PubMed ID: 29306883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suspected retinopathies in Norwegian optometric practice with emphasis on patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional study.
    Sundling V; Gulbrandsen P; Bragadottir R; Bakketeig LS; Jervell J; Straand J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Feb; 8():38. PubMed ID: 18261204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and use of vignettes to investigate referral decision-making by optometrists.
    Parkins DJ; Shah B; Benwell MJ; Evans BJW; Edgar DF
    J Optom; 2021; 14(4):346-354. PubMed ID: 33967018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice.
    Barrett C; O'Brien C; Loughman J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):400-410. PubMed ID: 29492992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of supervised student optometry consultations on the patient experience.
    Bentley SA; Trevaskis JE; Woods CA; Guest D; Watt KG
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):288-296. PubMed ID: 29132193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Australian optometric workforce 2009.
    Kiely PM; Horton P; Chakman J
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Sep; 93(5):330-40. PubMed ID: 20718789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discussions about evidence and preferences in real-life general practice consultations with older patients.
    Muscat DM; Shepherd HL; Hay L; Shivarev A; Patel B; McKinn S; Bonner C; McCaffery K; Jansen J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 May; 102(5):879-887. PubMed ID: 30578105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-stakeholder perspectives of locally commissioned enhanced optometric services.
    Baker H; Harper RA; Edgar DF; Lawrenson JG
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e011934. PubMed ID: 27798000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optometric practice in Norway: a cross-sectional nationwide study.
    Sundling V; Gulbrandsen P; Bragadottir R; Bakketeig LS; Jervell J; Straand J
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Sep; 85(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 17408386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.
    Tates K; Antheunis ML; Kanters S; Nieboer TE; Gerritse MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e421. PubMed ID: 29263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a new cataract surgery referral pathway.
    Park JC; Ross AH; Tole DM; Sparrow JM; Penny J; Mundasad MV
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 18259209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The future of optometric practice? The results of a survey of optometrists and optometry students.
    Silverman MW; Woodruff C; Hardigan PC
    Optometry; 2004 Oct; 75(10):615-23. PubMed ID: 15508862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shared decision-making in general practice: an observational study comparing 2007 with 2015.
    Meijers MC; Noordman J; Spreeuwenberg P; Olde Hartman TC; van Dulmen S
    Fam Pract; 2019 May; 36(3):357-364. PubMed ID: 30169562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining qualitative interviews with video-recorded consultations: gaining insight into GPs' decision-making.
    Coleman T; Murphy E
    Fam Pract; 1999 Apr; 16(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 10381025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Systematic Evaluation of State Laws Governing Optometric Glaucoma Management in the United States Upto 2015.
    Chodnicki K; Kalarn S; Quinn L; Jampel H; Saeedi O
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Mar; 27(3):233-238. PubMed ID: 29303871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Australian optometric and ophthalmologic referral pathways for people with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma.
    Jamous KF; Jalbert I; Kalloniatis M; Boon MY
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 May; 97(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24400653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.