These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30826385)

  • 1. Mechanisms of soft and hard electrophile toxicities.
    LoPachin RM; Geohagen BC; Nordstroem LU
    Toxicology; 2019 Apr; 418():62-69. PubMed ID: 30826385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of the Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) theory to toxicant--target interactions.
    Lopachin RM; Gavin T; Decaprio A; Barber DS
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 25(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 22053936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reactions of electrophiles with nucleophilic thiolate sites: relevance to pathophysiological mechanisms and remediation.
    LoPachin RM; Gavin T
    Free Radic Res; 2016; 50(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 26559119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity: a chemical perspective.
    LoPachin RM; Gavin T
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 27(7):1081-91. PubMed ID: 24911545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling of Toxicity-Relevant Electrophilic Reactivity for Guanine with Epoxides: Estimating the Hard and Soft Acids and Bases (HSAB) Parameter as a Predictor.
    Zhang J; Wang C; Ji L; Liu W
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 May; 29(5):841-50. PubMed ID: 26929981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular mechanism of acrylamide neurotoxicity: lessons learned from organic chemistry.
    LoPachin RM; Gavin T
    Environ Health Perspect; 2012 Dec; 120(12):1650-7. PubMed ID: 23060388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory as a method to predict cumulative neurotoxicity.
    Melnikov F; Geohagen BC; Gavin T; LoPachin RM; Anastas PT; Coish P; Herr DW
    Neurotoxicology; 2020 Jul; 79():95-103. PubMed ID: 32380191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: modeling soft electrophilicity.
    Schultz TW; Carlson RE; Cronin MT; Hermens JL; Johnson R; O'Brien PJ; Roberts DW; Siraki A; Wallace KB; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):413-28. PubMed ID: 16920662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systems analysis of protein modification and cellular responses induced by electrophile stress.
    Jacobs AT; Marnett LJ
    Acc Chem Res; 2010 May; 43(5):673-83. PubMed ID: 20218676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of structure-activity relationships to investigate the molecular mechanisms of hepatocyte toxicity and electrophilic reactivity of alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehydes.
    Chan K; Poon R; O'Brien PJ
    J Appl Toxicol; 2008 Nov; 28(8):1027-39. PubMed ID: 18626890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Reactivity of Ambident Nucleophiles: Marcus Theory or Hard and Soft Acids and Bases Principle?
    Wang YG; Barnes EC; Kaya S; Sharma V
    J Comput Chem; 2019 Dec; 40(31):2761-2777. PubMed ID: 31429098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The electronic factor in QSAR: MO-parameters, competing interactions, reactivity and toxicity.
    Mekenyan OG; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):129-43. PubMed ID: 8790643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Tetrahymena and Pimephales toxicity based on mechanism of action.
    Bearden AP; Schultz TW
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1998; 9(3-4):127-53. PubMed ID: 9933957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein adduct formation as a molecular mechanism in neurotoxicity.
    Lopachin RM; Decaprio AP
    Toxicol Sci; 2005 Aug; 86(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 15901921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurotoxic mechanisms of electrophilic type-2 alkenes: soft soft interactions described by quantum mechanical parameters.
    LoPachin RM; Gavin T; Geohagen BC; Das S
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Aug; 98(2):561-70. PubMed ID: 17519395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixture toxicity of reactive chemicals by using two bacterial growth assays as indicators of protein and DNA damage.
    Richter M; Escher BI
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8753-61. PubMed ID: 16323773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sulfane Sulfur in Toxicology: A Novel Defense System Against Electrophilic Stress.
    Shinkai Y; Kumagai Y
    Toxicol Sci; 2019 Jul; 170(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 30985901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chirality and its role in environmental toxicology.
    Ali I; Aboul-Enein HY; Sanagi MM; Ibrahim WA
    Exp Suppl; 2012; 101():413-36. PubMed ID: 22945577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Backside versus Frontside S
    Remmerswaal WA; de Jong T; van de Vrande KNA; Louwersheimer R; Verwaal T; Filippov DV; Codée JDC; Hansen T
    Chemistry; 2024 May; 30(25):e202400590. PubMed ID: 38385647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular mechanisms of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and acrolein toxicity: nucleophilic targets and adduct formation.
    LoPachin RM; Gavin T; Petersen DR; Barber DS
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1499-508. PubMed ID: 19610654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.