BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30829065)

  • 1. A Limited Information Estimator for Dynamic Factor Models.
    Fisher ZF; Bollen KA; Gates KM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):246-263. PubMed ID: 30829065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model Implied Instrumental Variables (MIIVs): An Alternative Orientation to Structural Equation Modeling.
    Bollen KA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 30222004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A robust alternative estimator for small to moderate sample SEM: Bias-corrected factor score path analysis.
    Kelcey B
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():83-98. PubMed ID: 30501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Relationship Between the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual and Model Misspecification in Factor Analysis Models.
    Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A; DiStefano C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):676-694. PubMed ID: 30596259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.
    Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F; Bollen KA
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):564-594. PubMed ID: 34097200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Instrumental Variable (IV) Tests to Evaluate Model Specification in Latent Variable Structural Equation Models.
    Kirby JB; Bollen KA
    Sociol Methodol; 2009 Jul; 39(1):327-355. PubMed ID: 20419054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ROBUSTNESS CONDITIONS FOR MIIV-2SLS WHEN THE LATENT VARIABLE OR MEASUREMENT MODEL IS STRUCTURALLY MISSPECIFIED.
    Bollen KA; Gates KM; Fisher Z
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2018; 25(6):848-859. PubMed ID: 30573943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Item Misspecification and Dichotomization on Class and Parameter Recovery in LCA of Count Data.
    Macia KS; Wickham RE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):113-145. PubMed ID: 30595072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.
    Rhemtulla M
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):348-368. PubMed ID: 26828780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
    Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing estimators for latent interaction models under structural and distributional misspecifications.
    Brandt H; Umbach N; Kelava A; Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):321-345. PubMed ID: 31670539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postselection Inference in Structural Equation Modeling.
    Huang PH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(3):344-360. PubMed ID: 31304796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pooling test statistics across multiply imputed datasets for nonnormal items.
    Jia F
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1229-1243. PubMed ID: 36973636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-step estimator for multilevel latent class analysis with covariates.
    Di Mari R; Bakk Z; Oser J; Kuha J
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1144-1170. PubMed ID: 37544973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data.
    Lee T; Shi D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Specification Error on the Estimation, Testing, and Improvement of Structural Equation Models.
    Kaplan D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1988 Jan; 23(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 26782258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.