These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants. González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT-based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers. Van Steenberghe D; Malevez C; Van Cleynenbreugel J; Bou Serhal C; Dhoore E; Schutyser F; Suetens P; Jacobs R Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12562376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-Time Surgical Navigation System for the Placement of Zygomatic Implants with Severe Bone Deficiency. Hung K; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1444-1449. PubMed ID: 27861671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy and clinical outcome of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants]. Tao BX; Wang F; Shen YH; Fan SQ; Huang W; Wang YP; Wu YQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):845-850. PubMed ID: 33171557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel guided zygomatic implant surgery system compared to free hand: A human cadaver study on accuracy. Grecchi E; Stefanelli LV; Grecchi F; Grivetto F; Franchina A; Pranno N J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():103942. PubMed ID: 34974136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The installation of zygomatic implants and drilling guide]. Wu YQ; Zhang ZY; Zhang CP; Huang W; Sun J; Zhang ZY Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 41(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 16777017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; Schutyser F; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 3D-Printed Guide to Assist in Sinus Slot Preparation for the Optimization of Zygomatic Implant Axis Trajectory. Wang CI; Cho SH; Cho D; Ducote C; Reddy LV; Sinada N J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 31889369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series. Neugarten JM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 37939239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides. Cunha RM; Souza FÁ; Hadad H; Poli PP; Maiorana C; Carvalho PSP J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel device for template-guided surgery of the zygomatic implants. Chow J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1253-5. PubMed ID: 27349591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]