These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30830509)

  • 1. Sugarcane must fed-batch fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: impact of sterilized and non-sterilized sugarcane must.
    Bonatelli ML; Ienczak JL; Labate CA
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2019 Aug; 112(8):1177-1187. PubMed ID: 30830509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Lactobacillus fermentum-Dekkera bruxellensis and feedstock on fuel ethanol fermentation.
    Bassi APG; Meneguello L; Paraluppi AL; Sanches BCP; Ceccato-Antonini SR
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1661-1672. PubMed ID: 29488182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional reprograming due to bacterial contamination during industrial scale bioethanol production.
    Carvalho-Netto OV; Carazzolle MF; Mofatto LS; Teixeira PJ; Noronha MF; Calderón LA; Mieczkowski PA; Argueso JL; Pereira GA
    Microb Cell Fact; 2015 Jan; 14():13. PubMed ID: 25633848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Homo- and heterofermentative lactobacilli differently affect sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
    Basso TO; Gomes FS; Lopes ML; de Amorim HV; Eggleston G; Basso LC
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2014 Jan; 105(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 24198118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cell recycling during repeated very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations using the industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PE-2.
    Pereira FB; Gomes DG; Guimarães PM; Teixeira JA; Domingues L
    Biotechnol Lett; 2012 Jan; 34(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 21898130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nisin incorporation enhances the inactivation of lactic acid bacteria during the acid wash step of bioethanol production from sugarcane juice.
    Zhang L; Holle MJ; Kim JS; Daum MA; Miller MJ
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 69(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 31004511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The consequences of Lactobacillus vini and Dekkera bruxellensis as contaminants of the sugarcane-based ethanol fermentation.
    de Souza RB; dos Santos BM; de Fátima Rodrigues de Souza R; da Silva PK; Lucena BT; de Morais MA
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Nov; 39(11):1645-50. PubMed ID: 22842986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Yeast Derived LysA2 Can Control Bacterial Contamination in Ethanol Fermentation.
    Kim JS; Daum MA; Jin YS; Miller MJ
    Viruses; 2018 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 29795003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of contamination with Lactobacillus fermentum I2 on ethanol production by Spathaspora passalidarum.
    Collograi KC; da Costa AC; Ienczak JL
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Jun; 103(12):5039-5050. PubMed ID: 30989252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of single and combined cell treatments based on low pH and high concentrations of ethanol on the growth and fermentation of Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Bassi AP; da Silva JC; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
    World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1661-76. PubMed ID: 23536198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of Brazilian bioethanol production - Challenges and perspectives on the identification and genetic modification of new strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts isolated during ethanol process.
    Paulino de Souza J; Dias do Prado C; Eleutherio ECA; Bonatto D; Malavazi I; Ferreira da Cunha A
    Fungal Biol; 2018 Jun; 122(6):583-591. PubMed ID: 29801803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethanol addition enhances acid treatment to eliminate Lactobacillus fermentum from the fermentation process for fuel ethanol production.
    Costa MAS; Cerri BC; Ceccato-Antonini SR
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 66(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29108112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil.
    Basso LC; de Amorim HV; de Oliveira AJ; Lopes ML
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2008 Nov; 8(7):1155-63. PubMed ID: 18752628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcriptional profiling of Brazilian Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains selected for semi-continuous fermentation of sugarcane must.
    Brown NA; de Castro PA; de Castro Pimentel Figueiredo B; Savoldi M; Buckeridge MS; Lopes ML; de Lima Paullilo SC; Borges EP; Amorim HV; Goldman MH; Bonatto D; Malavazi I; Goldman GH
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2013 May; 13(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 23360418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulation of Lactobacillus plantarum contamination on the carbohydrate and energy related metabolisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during bioethanol fermentation.
    Dong SJ; Lin XH; Li H
    Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2015 Nov; 68():33-41. PubMed ID: 26279142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.
    Ceccato-Antonini SR
    World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 May; 34(6):80. PubMed ID: 29802468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The fermentation of sugarcane molasses by Dekkera bruxellensis and the mobilization of reserve carbohydrates.
    Pereira LF; Lucatti E; Basso LC; de Morais MA
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2014 Mar; 105(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 24370978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complex yeast-bacteria interactions affect the yield of industrial ethanol fermentation.
    Senne de Oliveira Lino F; Bajic D; Vila JCC; Sánchez A; Sommer MOA
    Nat Commun; 2021 Mar; 12(1):1498. PubMed ID: 33686084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of sugarcane pieces as yeast supports for ethanol production from sugarcane juice and molasses.
    Liang L; Zhang YP; Zhang L; Zhu MJ; Liang SZ; Huang YN
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 35(12):1605-13. PubMed ID: 18685877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of microbial contaminants is driven by selection during ethanol production.
    Queiroz LL; Costa MS; de Abreu Pereira A; de Paula Avila M; Costa PS; Nascimento AMA; Lacorte GA
    Braz J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 51(1):303-312. PubMed ID: 31705383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.