These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30830530)

  • 1. Quantitative SPECT: the time is now.
    Dickson J; Ross J; Vöö S
    EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Mar; 6(1):4. PubMed ID: 30830530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of quantitative [I-123] mIBG SPECT/CT in a phantom and in patients with neuroblastoma.
    Brady SL; Shulkin BL
    EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):31. PubMed ID: 31889238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative SPECT: a survey of current practice in the UK Nuclear Medicine Community.
    Dickson JC
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Oct; 40(10):986-994. PubMed ID: 31343611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of standardized uptake values between
    Arvola S; Jambor I; Kuisma A; Kemppainen J; Kajander S; Seppänen M; Noponen T
    EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jan; 9(1):6. PubMed ID: 30680469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications.
    Bailey DL; Willowson KP
    J Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 54(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 23283563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does quantification have a role to play in the future of bone SPECT?
    Ross JC; Vilić D; Sanderson T; Vöö S; Dickson J
    Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2019 May; 3(1):8. PubMed ID: 34191209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study.
    Peters SMB; van der Werf NR; Segbers M; van Velden FHP; Wierts R; Blokland KJAK; Konijnenberg MW; Lazarenko SV; Visser EP; Gotthardt M
    EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):29. PubMed ID: 31879813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values Obtained by Quantitative PET/CT and SPECT/CT].
    Miwa K; Takahashi H; Miyaji N; Wagatsuma K; Murata T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2018; 38(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 30381717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative evaluation on [⁹⁰Y] DOTATOC PET and SPECT imaging by phantom acquisitions and clinical applications in locoregional and systemic treatments.
    Fabbri C; Mattone V; Casi M; De Lauro F; Agostini M; Bartolini N; D'arienzo M; Marchi G; Bartolomei M; Sarti G
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Dec; 56(6):522-8. PubMed ID: 23358405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and Interobserver Agreement of SUV SPECT Quantitative SPECT/CT Processing Software, Applied in Clinical Settings for Patients with Solid Renal Tumors.
    Tzortzakakis A; Holstensson M; Hagel E; Karlsson M; Axelsson R
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Sep; 47(3):258-262. PubMed ID: 31019039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. (99m)Tc-Annexin A5 quantification of apoptotic tumor response: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical imaging trials.
    Belhocine TZ; Blankenberg FG; Kartachova MS; Stitt LW; Vanderheyden JL; Hoebers FJ; Van de Wiele C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2083-97. PubMed ID: 26275392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer.
    Collarino A; Pereira Arias-Bouda LM; Valdés Olmos RA; van der Tol P; Dibbets-Schneider P; de Geus-Oei LF; van Velden FHP
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2143-2153. PubMed ID: 29572848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of Optimal Quantification of FDG PET Imaging in the Clinical Practice of Radiology.
    Ziai P; Hayeri MR; Salei A; Salavati A; Houshmand S; Alavi A; Teytelboym OM
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):481-96. PubMed ID: 26963458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absolute radiotracer concentration measurement using whole-body solid-state SPECT/CT technology: in vivo/in vitro validation.
    Kennedy JA; Reizberg I; Lugassi R; Himmelman S; Keidar Z
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jul; 57(7):1581-1590. PubMed ID: 31025249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nuclear medicine imaging in tuberculosis using commercially available radiopharmaceuticals.
    Sathekge M; Maes A; D'Asseler Y; Vorster M; Van de Wiele C
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):581-90. PubMed ID: 22422098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absolute Quantification in Diagnostic SPECT/CT: The Phantom Premise.
    De Schepper S; Gnanasegaran G; Dickson JC; Van den Wyngaert T
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34943570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a digital phantom developed by QIBA for harmonizing SUVs obtained from the state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter study.
    Nakahara T; Daisaki H; Yamamoto Y; Iimori T; Miyagawa K; Okamoto T; Owaki Y; Yada N; Sawada K; Tokorodani R; Jinzaki M
    EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):53. PubMed ID: 28639254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semiquantitative analysis using standardized uptake value in
    Toriihara A; Daisaki H; Yamaguchi A; Kobayashi M; Furukawa S; Yoshida K; Isogai J; Tateishi U
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():57-61. PubMed ID: 29909364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT Studies in Prostate Cancer.
    Oprea-Lager DE; Kramer G; van de Ven PM; van den Eertwegh AJ; van Moorselaar RJ; Schober P; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 26697964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.