These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30830542)

  • 1. Cochlea-inspired speech recognition interface.
    Russo M; Stella M; Sikora M; Šarić M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jun; 57(6):1393-1403. PubMed ID: 30830542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear spectro-temporal features based on a cochlear model for automatic speech recognition in a noisy situation.
    Choi YS; Lee SY
    Neural Netw; 2013 Sep; 45():62-9. PubMed ID: 23558292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A bio-inspired feature extraction for robust speech recognition.
    Zouhir Y; Ouni K
    Springerplus; 2014; 3():651. PubMed ID: 25485194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noise-robust speech recognition through auditory feature detection and spike sequence decoding.
    Schafer PB; Jin DZ
    Neural Comput; 2014 Mar; 26(3):523-56. PubMed ID: 24320849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploiting independent filter bandwidth of human factor cepstral coefficients in automatic speech recognition.
    Skowronski MD; Harris JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1774-80. PubMed ID: 15478444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
    Brown GJ; Ferry RT; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):943-54. PubMed ID: 20136217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A model of auditory perception as front end for automatic speech recognition.
    Tchorz J; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2040-50. PubMed ID: 10530027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biologically-Inspired Spike-Based Automatic Speech Recognition of Isolated Digits Over a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space.
    Li K; Príncipe JC
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():194. PubMed ID: 29666568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic speech recognition using a predictive echo state network classifier.
    Skowronski MD; Harris JG
    Neural Netw; 2007 Apr; 20(3):414-23. PubMed ID: 17556115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition.
    Jansen A; Niyogi P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noisy speech recognition using de-noised multiresolution analysis acoustic features.
    Chan CP; Ching PC; Lee T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2567-74. PubMed ID: 11757946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing speech recognition using improved particle swarm optimization based hidden Markov model.
    Selvaraj L; Ganesan B
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():270576. PubMed ID: 25478588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Across-frequency delays based on the cochlear traveling wave: enhanced speech presentation for cochlear implants.
    Taft DA; Grayden DB; Burkitt AN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):596-606. PubMed ID: 19846368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting fundamental frequency from mel-frequency cepstral coefficients to enable speech reconstruction.
    Shao X; Milner B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1134-43. PubMed ID: 16158667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separable spectro-temporal Gabor filter bank features: Reducing the complexity of robust features for automatic speech recognition.
    Schädler MR; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):2047-59. PubMed ID: 25920855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectro-temporal modulation subspace-spanning filter bank features for robust automatic speech recognition.
    Schädler M; Meyer BT; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4134-51. PubMed ID: 22559385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An improved speech processing strategy for cochlear implants based on an active nonlinear filterbank model of the biological cochlea.
    Kim KH; Choi SJ; Kim JH; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):828-36. PubMed ID: 19272890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.