These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30830827)

  • 1. Americans' Growing Exposure To Clinician Quality Information: Insights And Implications.
    Schlesinger MJ; Rybowski L; Shaller D; Martino S; Parler AM; Grob R; Finucane M; Cerully J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2019 Mar; 38(3):374-382. PubMed ID: 30830827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is Anyone Paying Attention to Physician Report Cards? The Impact of Increased Availability on Consumers' Awareness and Use of Physician Quality Information.
    Shi Y; Scanlon DP; Bhandari N; Christianson JB
    Health Serv Res; 2017 Aug; 52(4):1570-1589. PubMed ID: 27468943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
    Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.
    Schlesinger M; Kanouse DE; Martino SC; Shaller D; Rybowski L
    Med Care Res Rev; 2014 Oct; 71(5 Suppl):38S-64S. PubMed ID: 23999489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumers' Interest In Provider Ratings Grows, And Improved Report Cards And Other Steps Could Accelerate Their Use.
    Findlay SD
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Apr; 35(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 27044970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why Do So Few Consumers Use Health Care Quality Report Cards? A Framework for Understanding the Limited Consumer Impact of Comparative Quality Information.
    Bhandari N; Scanlon DP; Shi Y; Smith RA
    Med Care Res Rev; 2019 Oct; 76(5):515-537. PubMed ID: 29745305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Context-based strategies for engaging consumers with public reports about health care providers.
    Shaller D; Kanouse DE; Schlesinger M
    Med Care Res Rev; 2014 Oct; 71(5 Suppl):17S-37S. PubMed ID: 23819945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consumers' descriptions of quality health care.
    Oermann MH
    J Nurs Care Qual; 1999 Oct; 14(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 10575830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians.
    Burkle CM; Keegan MT
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():416. PubMed ID: 26410383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making survey results easy to report to consumers: how reporting needs guided survey design in CAHPS. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.
    McGee J; Kanouse DE; Sofaer S; Hargraves JL; Hoy E; Kleimann S
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3 Suppl):MS32-40. PubMed ID: 10098557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans.
    Harris KM
    Health Serv Res; 2003 Apr; 38(2):711-32. PubMed ID: 12785569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance Measures.
    Kanouse DE; Schlesinger M; Shaller D; Martino SC; Rybowski L
    Med Care; 2016 Jan; 54(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 26551765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumer-Facing Data, Information, And Tools: Self-Management Of Health In The Digital Age.
    Singh K; Meyer SR; Westfall JM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2019 Mar; 38(3):352-358. PubMed ID: 30830832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dr Google Is Here to Stay but Health Care Professionals Are Still Valued: An Analysis of Health Care Consumers' Internet Navigation Support Preferences.
    Lee K; Hoti K; Hughes JD; Emmerton L
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e210. PubMed ID: 28615156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Rigorous Approach to Large-Scale Elicitation and Analysis of Patient Narratives.
    Schlesinger M; Grob R; Shaller D; Martino SC; Parker AM; Rybowski L; Finucane ML; Cerully JL
    Med Care Res Rev; 2020 Oct; 77(5):416-427. PubMed ID: 30293521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Patient-Reported Information to Improve Clinical Practice.
    Schlesinger M; Grob R; Shaller D
    Health Serv Res; 2015 Dec; 50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2116-54. PubMed ID: 26573890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.
    Gulley SP; Altman BM
    Disabil Health J; 2008 Oct; 1(4):196-208. PubMed ID: 21122730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer response to patient experience measures in complex information environments.
    Schlesinger M; Kanouse DE; Rybowski L; Martino SC; Shaller D
    Med Care; 2012 Nov; 50 Suppl():S56-64. PubMed ID: 23064278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postscript: research agenda to guide the next generation of public reports for consumers.
    Damberg CL; McNamara P
    Med Care Res Rev; 2014 Oct; 71(5 Suppl):97S-107S. PubMed ID: 24860123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.