199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30831315)
1. Reasoning about clinical guidelines based on algebraic data types and constraint logic programming.
Pérez B
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Apr; 92():103134. PubMed ID: 30831315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Authoring and verification of clinical guidelines: a model driven approach.
Pérez B; Porres I
J Biomed Inform; 2010 Aug; 43(4):520-36. PubMed ID: 20206714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sharable representation of clinical guidelines in GLIF: relationship to the Arden Syntax.
Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Bernstam E; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
J Biomed Inform; 2001 Jun; 34(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 11723699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adopting model checking techniques for clinical guidelines verification.
Bottrighi A; Giordano L; Molino G; Montani S; Terenziani P; Torchio M
Artif Intell Med; 2010 Jan; 48(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 19864118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Formal verification of software-based medical devices considering medical guidelines.
Daw Z; Cleaveland R; Vetter M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jan; 9(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 23824830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Knowledge-based verification of clinical guidelines by detection of anomalies.
Duftschmid G; Miksch S
Artif Intell Med; 2001 Apr; 22(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 11259882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards a traceable clinical guidelines application. A model-driven approach.
Domínguez E; Pérez B; Zapata M
Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(6):571-80. PubMed ID: 20027382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconciling pairs of concurrently used clinical practice guidelines using Constraint Logic Programming.
Wilk S; Michalowski M; Michalowski W; Hing MM; Farion K
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():944-53. PubMed ID: 22195153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Executable medical guidelines with Arden Syntax-Applications in dermatology and obstetrics.
Seitinger A; Rappelsberger A; Leitich H; Binder M; Adlassnig KP
Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():71-81. PubMed ID: 27686851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visually defining and querying consistent multi-granular clinical temporal abstractions.
Combi C; Oliboni B
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Feb; 54(2):75-101. PubMed ID: 22177662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Handling expressiveness and comprehensibility requirements in GLIF3.
Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH; Patel VL
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11604741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An automated data verification approach for improving data quality in a clinical registry.
Tian Q; Liu M; Min L; An J; Lu X; Duan H
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Nov; 181():104840. PubMed ID: 30777618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format.
Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Ogunyemi O; Zeng Q; Tu S; Lacson R; Bernstam E; Ash N; Mork P; Ohno-Machado L; Shortliffe EH; Greenes RA
Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():645-9. PubMed ID: 11079963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The temporal aspects of clinical guidelines.
Terenziani P; German E; Shahar Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 139():81-100. PubMed ID: 18806322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated generation of patient-tailored electronic care pathways by translating computer-interpretable guidelines into hierarchical task networks.
González-Ferrer A; ten Teije A; Fdez-Olivares J; Milian K
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Feb; 57(2):91-109. PubMed ID: 23177024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using GEM-encoded guidelines to generate medical logic modules.
Agrawal A; Shiffman RN
Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():7-11. PubMed ID: 11825147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Describing and recognizing patterns of events in smart environments with description logic.
Scalmato A; Sgorbissa A; Zaccaria R
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2013 Dec; 43(6):1882-97. PubMed ID: 23757579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A formal approach to the analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.
Grando MA; Glasspool D; Fox J
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21788121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a standard for guideline representation: an ontological approach.
Pisanelli DM; Gangemi A; Steve G
Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():906-10. PubMed ID: 10566492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Domain-constrained generation of clinical condition sets to help test computer-based clinical guidelines.
Miller PL
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2001; 8(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 11230382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
