These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30831315)

  • 21. Protein topology prediction through parallel constraint logic programming.
    Clark DA; Rawlings CJ; Shirazi J; Veron A; Reeve M
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1993; 1():83-91. PubMed ID: 7584374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Data-driven knowledge acquisition, validation, and transformation into HL7 Arden Syntax.
    Hussain M; Afzal M; Ali T; Ali R; Khan WA; Jamshed A; Lee S; Kang BH; Latif K
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():51-70. PubMed ID: 26573247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facilitating knowledge maintenance of clinical guidelines and protocols.
    Votruba P; Miksch S; Kosara R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):57-61. PubMed ID: 15360774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An implementation framework for GEM encoded guidelines.
    Gershkovich P; Shiffman RN
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():204-8. PubMed ID: 11825181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models.
    Wang D; Peleg M; Tu SW; Boxwala AA; Greenes RA; Patel VL; Shortliffe EH
    Int J Med Inform; 2002 Dec; 68(1-3):59-70. PubMed ID: 12467791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Digital electronic Guideline Library (DeGeL): a hybrid framework for representation and use of clinical guidelines.
    Shahar Y; Young O; Shalom E; Mayaffit A; Moskovitch R; Hessing A; Galperin M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():147-51. PubMed ID: 15537218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving medical protocols by formal methods.
    ten Teije A; Marcos M; Balser M; van Croonenborg J; Duelli C; van Harmelen F; Lucas P; Miksch S; Reif W; Rosenbrand K; Seyfang A
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Mar; 36(3):193-209. PubMed ID: 16376061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Towards a comprehensive treatment of repetitions, periodicity and temporal constraints in clinical guidelines.
    Anselma L; Terenziani P; Montani S; Bottrighi A
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Oct; 38(2):171-95. PubMed ID: 16766167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Translating Arden MlMs into GLIF guidelines--a case study of hyperkalemia patient screening.
    Wang D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():177-81. PubMed ID: 15537224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Support for guideline development through error classification and constraint checking.
    Peleg M; Patel VL; Snow V; Tu S; Mottur-Pilson C; Shortliffe EH; Greenes RA
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2002; ():607-11. PubMed ID: 12463895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Verification of temporal scheduling constraints in clinical practice guidelines.
    Duftschmid G; Miksch S; Gall W
    Artif Intell Med; 2002 Jun; 25(2):93-121. PubMed ID: 12031602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A constraint satisfaction approach to data-driven implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
    Kuziemsky C; O'Sullivan D; Michalowski W; Wilk S; Farion K
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():540-4. PubMed ID: 18999133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. TimeWrap--a method for automatic transformation of structured guideline components into formal process-representations.
    Kaiser K; Miksch S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():61-74. PubMed ID: 15537206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of guideline quality using GEM-Q.
    Agrawal A; Shiffman RN
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11604898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Communicating the logic of a treatment plan formulated in Asbru to domain experts.
    Aigner W; Miksch S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 101():1-15. PubMed ID: 15537202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. BioSim--a new qualitative simulation environment for molecular biology.
    Heidtke KR; Schulze-Kremer S
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1998; 6():85-94. PubMed ID: 9783213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new approach for investigating protein flexibility based on Constraint Logic Programming. The first application in the case of the estrogen receptor.
    Dal Palú A; Spyrakis F; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2012 Mar; 49():127-40. PubMed ID: 22277571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An architecture for a continuous, user-driven, and data-driven application of clinical guidelines and its evaluation.
    Shalom E; Shahar Y; Lunenfeld E
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Feb; 59():130-48. PubMed ID: 26616284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Encoding and verification of a computer-interpretable guideline: a case study of pressure-ulcer management.
    Kim HY; Park HA; Cho I; Kim J; Lee J
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 27092468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.