These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 308328)

  • 1. [The effect of the pupil as aperture and field stop on the various components of the human electroretinogram (author's transl)].
    Hoffmann ML; Zrenner E; Langhof HJ
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1978 Jun; 206(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 308328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Chromatic adaptation produces opposite effects on the on and off responses of the photopic electroretinogram (author's transl)].
    Langhof HJ
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1977 Dec; 204(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 304685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constant luminance (cd·s/m
    Davis CQ; Kraszewska O; Manning C
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 28160194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The homogeneity of the retinal illumination is restricted by some ERG lenses.
    Kooijman AC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 Mar; 27(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 3949465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retinal on-pathway deficit in congenital disorder of glycosylation due to phosphomannomutase deficiency.
    Thompson DA; Lyons RJ; Liasis A; Russell-Eggitt I; Jägle H; Grünewald S
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 130(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 22801829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-ocular and inter-session reliability of the electroretinogram photopic negative response (PhNR) in non-human primates.
    Fortune B; Bui BV; Cull G; Wang L; Cioffi GA
    Exp Eye Res; 2004 Jan; 78(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 14667830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERG oscillatory potentials in infants.
    Moskowitz A; Hansen RM; Fulton AB
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2005; 110(2-3):265-70. PubMed ID: 16328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The scotopic threshold response of the dark-adapted electroretinogram of the mouse.
    Saszik SM; Robson JG; Frishman LJ
    J Physiol; 2002 Sep; 543(Pt 3):899-916. PubMed ID: 12231647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the impact of non-dilating the eye on full-field electroretinogram and standard flash response.
    Gagné AM; Lavoie J; Lavoie MP; Sasseville A; Charron MC; Hébert M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 121(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20697777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-field electroretinogram in autism spectrum disorder.
    Constable PA; Gaigg SB; Bowler DM; Jägle H; Thompson DA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 132(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 26868825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ganglion cell contributions to the rat full-field electroretinogram.
    Bui BV; Fortune B
    J Physiol; 2004 Feb; 555(Pt 1):153-73. PubMed ID: 14578484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of field size on pupil diameter under photopic and mesopic light levels.
    Atchison DA; Girgenti CC; Campbell GM; Dodds JP; Byrnes TM; Zele AJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Nov; 94(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 21929524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Photopic and scotopic multifocal pupillographic responses in age-related macular degeneration.
    Rosli Y; Bedford SM; James AC; Maddess T
    Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 69():42-8. PubMed ID: 22898702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers.
    Stronks HC; Barry MP; Dagnelie G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 26743880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative relationship of the scotopic and photopic ERG to photoreceptor cell loss in light damaged rats.
    Sugawara T; Sieving PA; Bush RA
    Exp Eye Res; 2000 May; 70(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 10870528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of adaptation on DC-component of human electroretinogram.
    Li XX; Foerster MH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1989 Oct; 102(10):800-5. PubMed ID: 2517061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The D.C. response in the human electroretinogram under different degrees of wakefulness (author's transl)].
    Rix R; Korth M
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1977 Nov; 204(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 304322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.
    Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Walters JW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 11157891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retinal A2A and A3 adenosine receptors modulate the components of the rat electroretinogram.
    Jonsson G; Eysteinsson T
    Vis Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 34():E001. PubMed ID: 28304243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.