These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30832973)
1. Measuring Weight-Specific Quality of Life in Adolescents: An Examination of the Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the WAItE. Oluboyede Y; Tomos Robinson Value Health; 2019 Mar; 22(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 30832973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating CHU-9D Utility Scores from the WAItE: A Mapping Algorithm for Economic Evaluation. Robinson T; Oluboyede Y Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 30711070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The weight-specific adolescent instrument for economic evaluation (WAItE): psychometric evaluation using a Rasch model approach. Oluboyede Y; Smith AB; Hill A; Hulme C Qual Life Res; 2019 Apr; 28(4):969-977. PubMed ID: 30519905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement properties of the Chinese version of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Weight Module (YQOL-W). Jiang XY; Wang HM; Edwards TC; Chen YP; Lv YR; Patrick DL PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e109221. PubMed ID: 25268884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing a preference-based measure for weight-specific health-related quality of life in adolescence: the WAItE UK valuation study protocol. Robinson T; Hill S; Oluboyede Y BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e054203. PubMed ID: 34785557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the construct validity of the Child Health Utility 9D-CHN instrument in school-aged children: evidence from a Chinese trial. Zanganeh M; Adab P; Li B; Frew E Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Aug; 19(1):205. PubMed ID: 34446001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whose values in health? An empirical comparison of the application of adolescent and adult values for the CHU-9D and AQOL-6D in the Australian adolescent general population. Ratcliffe J; Stevens K; Flynn T; Brazier J; Sawyer MG Value Health; 2012; 15(5):730-6. PubMed ID: 22867783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility, reliability and validity of the health-related quality of life instrument Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) among school-aged children and adolescents in Sweden. Lindvall K; Vaezghasemi M; Feldman I; Ivarsson A; Stevens KJ; Petersen S Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Aug; 19(1):193. PubMed ID: 34344386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How does age affect the relationship between weight and health utility during the middle years of childhood? Eminson K; Canaway A; Adab P; Lancashire E; Pallan M; Frew E Qual Life Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1455-1462. PubMed ID: 29404925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring preference-based quality of life in children aged 6-7 years: a comparison of the performance of the CHU-9D and EQ-5D-Y--the WAVES pilot study. Canaway AG; Frew EJ Qual Life Res; 2013 Feb; 22(1):173-83. PubMed ID: 22302618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™) Generic Core Scales onto the Child Health Utility Index-9 Dimension (CHU-9D) Score for Economic Evaluation in Children. Lambe T; Frew E; Ives NJ; Woolley RL; Cummins C; Brettell EA; Barsoum EN; Webb NJA; Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Apr; 36(4):451-465. PubMed ID: 29264866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and refinement of the WAItE: a new obesity-specific quality of life measure for adolescents. Oluboyede Y; Hulme C; Hill A Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2025-2039. PubMed ID: 28503713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments. Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the CHU-9D and the EQ-5D-Y instruments in children and young people with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study. Ryan JM; McKay E; Anokye N; Noorkoiv M; Theis N; Lavelle G BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e037089. PubMed ID: 32912983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weight loss and changes in generic and weight-specific quality of life in obese adolescents. Patrick DL; Skalicky AM; Edwards TC; Kuniyuki A; Morales LS; Leng M; Kirschenbaum DS Qual Life Res; 2011 Aug; 20(6):961-8. PubMed ID: 21188537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The construct validity of the Child Health Utility 9D-DK instrument. Petersen KD; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Serles D; Frøsig CS; Olesen AV Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Dec; 17(1):187. PubMed ID: 31870369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire. Schlösser TP; Stadhouder A; Schimmel JJ; Lehr AM; van der Heijden GJ; Castelein RM Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 24360746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences. Patrick DL; Topolski TD; Edwards TC; Aspinall CL; Kapp-Simon KA; Rumsey NJ; Strauss RP; Thomas CR Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Sep; 44(5):538-47. PubMed ID: 17760483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement properties of a multicultural weight-specific quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. Morales LS; Edwards TC; Flores Y; Barr L; Patrick DL Qual Life Res; 2011 Mar; 20(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 20820926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Valuing selected WAItE health states using the Time Trade-Off methodology: findings from an online interviewer-assisted remote survey. Robinson T; Hill S; Orozco-Leal G; Kernohan A; King W; Oluboyede Y J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2024 Jan; 8(1):6. PubMed ID: 38214796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]