195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30833440)
1. Infectious complications of laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Marra AR; Puig-Asensio M; Edmond MB; Schweizer ML; Bender D
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):518-530. PubMed ID: 30833440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Infectious Complications of Conventional Laparoscopic vs Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
Marra AR; Puig-Asensio M; Edmond MB; Schweizer ML; Nepple KG
J Endourol; 2019 Mar; 33(3):179-188. PubMed ID: 30632396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uccella S; Zorzato PC; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):710-720. PubMed ID: 33348012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mortality Rates in Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):603-612.e1. PubMed ID: 31627007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Albright BB; Witte T; Tofte AN; Chou J; Black JD; Desai VB; Erekson EA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 26272688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Is Not Superior to Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Perioperative Urologic Complications: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies.
Hwang JH; Kim BW; Kim SR; Kim JH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 31315060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications.
Cusimano MC; Simpson AN; Dossa F; Liani V; Kaur Y; Acuna SA; Robertson D; Satkunaratnam A; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Baxter NN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):410-428.e19. PubMed ID: 31082383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.
Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value-based assessment of hysterectomy approaches.
Danilyants N; MacKoul P; Baxi R; van der Does LQ; Haworth LR
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):389-398. PubMed ID: 30402927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy after Previous Bladder Outlet Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Veccia A; Antonelli A; Francavilla S; Porpiglia F; Simeone C; Lima E; Zargar H; Eun D; Hampton LJ; Autorino R
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):511-517. PubMed ID: 31039100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer.
El-Achi V; Weishaupt J; Carter J; Saidi S
J Robot Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):483-487. PubMed ID: 32737804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review.
Iavazzo C; Gkegkes ID
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 293(6):1169-83. PubMed ID: 26861466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging.
Turner TB; Habib AS; Broadwater G; Valea FA; Fleming ND; Ehrisman JA; Di Santo N; Havrilesky LJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 25967934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
