These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3083363)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of a new nonelectronic all-in-the-ear hearing device for mild hearing loss.
    Goode RL; O'Keefe R; Homan D; Hosford-Dunn H; Wood M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1986 Mar; 94(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 3083363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
    Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing].
    Ruh S; Battmer RD; Strauss-Schier A; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jun; 76(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 9333278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the California Consonant Test in evaluating hearing aids.
    Edgerton BJ; Danhauer JL; Simmons FJ
    Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 3963153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system.
    Roland PS; Shoup AG; Shea MC; Richey HS; Jones DB
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Oct; 111(10):1682-6. PubMed ID: 11801925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporary threshold shift caused by hearing aid use.
    Macrae JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 8487528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Rehabilitation of high frequency hearing loss: use of an active middle ear implant].
    Böheim K; Nahler A; Schlögel M
    HNO; 2007 Sep; 55(9):690-5. PubMed ID: 17160659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
    Halpin C; Rauch SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of automatic signal-processing amplification on speech recognition in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Dempsey JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1987; 96(3 Pt 1):251-3. PubMed ID: 3605946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vibrant semi-implantable hearing device with digital sound processing: effective gain and speech perception.
    Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Dec; 127(12):1433-7. PubMed ID: 11735810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Otologics middle ear transducer with contralateral conventional hearing aid in severe sensorineural hearing loss: evolution during the first 24 months.
    Tringali S; Perrot X; Berger P; Granade GL; Dubreuil C; Truy E
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jun; 31(4):630-6. PubMed ID: 20418795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.