These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30833715)

  • 1. Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests.
    Tsai LT; Jang Y; Liao KM; Chen CC
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3338. PubMed ID: 30833715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of optical defocus on the legibility of the Tumbling-E and Landolt-C.
    Reich LN; Ekabutr M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 12086306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population.
    Zhang JY; Zhang T; Xue F; Liu L; Yu C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2383-90. PubMed ID: 17460306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of the Lithander (Kolt test) pediatric visual acuity test with the standardized Landolt ring test].
    Cavazos H; Schulz E; Rassow B; Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):324-8. PubMed ID: 2280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.
    Candy TR; Mishoulam SR; Nosofsky RM; Dobson V
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4307-13. PubMed ID: 21436270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative legibility study using Chinese optotypes.
    Cheng AS
    Singapore Med J; 1991 Feb; 32(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2017704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying image descriptors to the assessment of legibility in Chinese characters.
    Chi CF; Cai D; You M
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jun; 46(8):825-41. PubMed ID: 12745981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legibility of Chinese characters in peripheral vision and the top-down influences on crowding.
    Zhang JY; Zhang T; Xue F; Liu L; Yu C
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 18929592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters.
    Wang H; He X; Legge GE
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):6. PubMed ID: 24993020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on legibility of characters for the elderly--effects of character display modes on legibility.
    Tomioka K
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2007 Mar; 26(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 17435359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The key parameters of design research and analysis of the Chinese reading visual acuity chart].
    Wang CX; Liu ZH; Gao JT; Guo YX; He JC; Qu J; Lü F
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 49(6):536-40. PubMed ID: 24119968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model of character recognition and legibility.
    Loomis JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):106-20. PubMed ID: 2137513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B; Wang Y
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letter legibility and visual word recognition.
    Nazir TA; Jacobs AM; O'Regan JK
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 9701972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.
    Déruaz A; Goldschmidt M; Mermoud C; Whatham AR; Safran AB
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 244(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 16163495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating a novel concept of sentence optotypes into the RADNER Reading Charts.
    Radner W; Radner S; Diendorfer G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 101(3):239-243. PubMed ID: 27881374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.