These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3083455)

  • 1. Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
    Heyman GM; Kinzie DL; Seiden LS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 88(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 3083455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy.
    Heyman GM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1992; 109(1-2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1365648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.
    Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 6631310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of pimozide's motor and hedonic effects on operant behavior in rats.
    Porter JH; Villanueva HF
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Dec; 31(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 3252268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pimozide attenuates lever pressing for water reinforcement in rats.
    Gerber GJ; Sing J; Wise RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Feb; 14(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 7208559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A parametric description of amphetamine's effect on response rate: changes in reinforcement efficacy and response topography.
    Heyman GM; Seiden LS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 85(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 3925482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of pimozide on variable-interval performance: a test of the 'anhedonia' hypothesis of the mode of action of neuroleptics.
    Morley MJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1984; 84(4):531-6. PubMed ID: 6152057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.
    Phillips G; Willner P; Sampson D; Nunn J; Muscat R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 104(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 1881998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low doses of cis-flupentixol attenuate motor performance.
    Heyman GM; Monaghan MM; Clody DE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1987; 93(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 3124182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of pimozide, across doses and within sessions, on discriminated lever release performance in rats.
    Skjoldager P; Fowler SC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 3147474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Force-proportional reinforcement: pimozide does not reduce rats' emission of higher forces for sweeter rewards.
    Kirkpatrick MA; Fowler SC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Feb; 32(2):499-504. PubMed ID: 2727011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation.
    Miliaressis E; Rompre PP; Laviolette P; Philippe L; Coulombe D
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 37(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 3016774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of pimozide on lever pressing behavior maintained on an intermittent reinforcement schedule.
    Gray T; Wise RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Jun; 12(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 7403207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential sensitivity of operant behaviors to changes in the concentration of a sucrose reinforcer: effects of pimozide.
    Vigorito M; Kruse CB; Carretta JC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Mar; 47(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 8208769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attenuation by pimozide of the suppressant effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour.
    Morley MJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1987; 91(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 3107040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat.
    Mobini S; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Sep; 152(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11041315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: failure to observe functional equivalence.
    Tombaugh TN; Anisman H; Tombaugh J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 70(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 6775330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement.
    Beninger RJ; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 68(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 6776557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethanol's effects on operant responding: differentiating reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
    Petry NM
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Apr; 64(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 9661991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the effects of pimozide and nonreinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats.
    Beninger RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Apr; 16(4):667-9. PubMed ID: 7071097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.