These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30834686)

  • 1. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
    Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the use of exposure indicators in digital x-ray imaging system: Gauteng South Africa.
    Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):e58-e62. PubMed ID: 31301792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
    Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
    Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.
    Gibson DJ; Davidson RA
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22225727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
    Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographer knowledge and practice of paediatric radiation dose protocols in digital radiography in Gauteng.
    Moolman N; Mulla F; Mdletshe S
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):117-121. PubMed ID: 32052787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.
    Takaki T; Takeda K; Murakami S; Ogawa H; Ogawa M; Sakamoto M
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 26613753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.
    Peters SE; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2381-7. PubMed ID: 12195499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary).
    Shepard SJ; Wang J; Flynn M; Gingold E; Goldman L; Krugh K; Leong DL; Mah E; Ogden K; Peck D; Samei E; Wang J; Willis CE
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2898-914. PubMed ID: 19673189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed radiography X-ray exposure trends.
    Seibert JA; Shelton DK; Moore EH
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 8796680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine.
    Warren-Forward H; Arthur L; Hobson L; Skinner R; Watts A; Clapham K; Lou D; Cook A
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 80(949):26-31. PubMed ID: 16916804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Lewis SJ; Moran B; Robinson J
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 61(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 26229645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving Radiation Protection in Digital Radiography.
    Moore QT
    Radiol Technol; 2016 Sep; 88(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 27601688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing the Exposure Indicator as a Dose Management Strategy in Computed Radiography.
    Seeram E; Davidson R; Bushong S; Swan H
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 26952062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.