These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30835886)

  • 1. Prediction intervals for overdispersed binomial data with application to historical controls.
    Menssen M; Schaarschmidt F
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2652-2663. PubMed ID: 30835886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A non-iterative accurate asymptotic confidence interval for the difference between two proportions.
    Wallenstein S
    Stat Med; 1997 Jun; 16(12):1329-36. PubMed ID: 9232756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
    Maruo K; Kawai N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum likelihood estimation of the negative binomial dispersion parameter for highly overdispersed data, with applications to infectious diseases.
    Lloyd-Smith JO
    PLoS One; 2007 Feb; 2(2):e180. PubMed ID: 17299582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Different Calculation Approaches for Defining Microbiological Control Levels Based on Historical Data.
    Gordon O; Goverde M; Pazdan J; Staerk A; Roesti D
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 26048745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved exact confidence intervals for the odds ratio in two independent binomial samples.
    Lin CY; Yang MC
    Biom J; 2006 Dec; 48(6):1008-19. PubMed ID: 17240658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal beta-binomial modeling using GEE for overdispersed binomial data.
    Wu H; Zhang Y; Long JD
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):1029-1040. PubMed ID: 27917499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pooling overdispersed binomial data to estimate event rate.
    Young-Xu Y; Chan KA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Aug; 8():58. PubMed ID: 18713448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence intervals for the difference between independent binomial proportions: comparison using a graphical approach and moving averages.
    Laud PJ; Dane A
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(5):294-308. PubMed ID: 25163425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust inference in the negative binomial regression model with an application to falls data.
    Aeberhard WH; Cantoni E; Heritier S
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):920-31. PubMed ID: 25156188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing methods for analyzing overdispersed binary data in aquatic toxicology.
    Noble RB; Bailer AJ; Noe DA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2009 May; 28(5):997-1006. PubMed ID: 19049261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculation for clinical trials with correlated count measurements based on the negative binomial distribution.
    Li D; Zhang S; Cao J
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5413-5427. PubMed ID: 31652010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new regression model for overdispersed binomial data accounting for outliers and an excess of zeros.
    Ascari R; Migliorati S
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(17):3895-3914. PubMed ID: 33960503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
    Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beta-binomial model for meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1715-1734. PubMed ID: 28124446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the odds of inherent vs. observed overdispersion in neural spike counts.
    Taouali W; Benvenuti G; Wallisch P; Chavane F; Perrinet LU
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 115(1):434-44. PubMed ID: 26445864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of observation-level random effect and Beta-Binomial models for modelling overdispersion in Binomial data in ecology & evolution.
    Harrison XA
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1114. PubMed ID: 26244118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensemble confidence intervals for binomial proportions.
    Park H; Leemis LM
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3460-3475. PubMed ID: 31099897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing methods for analyzing overdispersed count data in aquatic toxicology.
    Noe DA; Bailer AJ; Noble RB
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Jan; 29(1):212-9. PubMed ID: 20821437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.