These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30836293)

  • 21. Examining traffic conflicts of up stream toll plaza area using vehicles' trajectory data.
    Xing L; He J; Abdel-Aty M; Cai Q; Li Y; Zheng O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():174-187. PubMed ID: 30771587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting real-time traffic conflicts using deep learning.
    Formosa N; Quddus M; Ison S; Abdel-Aty M; Yuan J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105429. PubMed ID: 31931409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How Does C-V2X Help Autonomous Driving to Avoid Accidents?
    Miao L; Chen SF; Hsu YL; Hua KL
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics for real-time assessment of rear-end collision risk. A study based on empirical observations.
    Mattas K; Makridis M; Botzoris G; Kriston A; Minarini F; Papadopoulos B; Re F; Rognelund G; Ciuffo B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105794. PubMed ID: 33032008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review on Functional Testing Scenario Library Generation for Connected and Automated Vehicles.
    Zhu Y; Wang J; Meng F; Liu T
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A method for identifying rear-end collision risks using inductive loop detectors.
    Oh C; Park S; Ritchie SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 16246286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gold C; Happee R; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():3-13. PubMed ID: 29196019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of time dependent probabilistic collision state checkers in highly dynamic environments.
    Hernández-Aceituno J; Acosta L; Piñeiro JD
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119930. PubMed ID: 25799557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting crash frequency for multi-vehicle collision types using multivariate Poisson-lognormal spatial model: A comparative analysis.
    Hosseinpour M; Sahebi S; Zamzuri ZH; Yahaya AS; Ismail N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():277-288. PubMed ID: 29861069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Calibration of skill and judgment in driving: development of a conceptual framework and the implications for road safety.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Mar; 76():25-33. PubMed ID: 25560901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.
    Thompson JP; Mackenzie JRR; Dutschke JK; Baldock MRJ; Raftery SJ; Wall J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():34-40. PubMed ID: 29544135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles' platooning on expressways.
    Rahman MS; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():381-391. PubMed ID: 29275900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of lead time of verbal collision warning messages on driving behavior in connected vehicle settings.
    Wan J; Wu C; Zhang Y
    J Safety Res; 2016 Sep; 58():89-98. PubMed ID: 27620938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subjective risk and associated electrodermal activity of a self-driving car passenger in an urban shared space.
    Petit J; Charron C; Mars F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0289913. PubMed ID: 38033016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems.
    Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():55-64. PubMed ID: 29654988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a real-time crash risk prediction model incorporating the various crash mechanisms across different traffic states.
    Xu C; Wang W; Liu P; Zhang F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 24697528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A collision model for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control.
    Touran A; Brackstone MA; McDonald M
    Accid Anal Prev; 1999 Sep; 31(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 10440554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Edge conditions and crash-avoidance roles: the future of traffic safety in the world of autonomous vehicles.
    Ryerson MS; Miller JE; Winston FK
    Inj Prev; 2019 Apr; 25(2):76-79. PubMed ID: 29353244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.