These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30836805)

  • 1. Lower initial electrode impedances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
    Liu X; Xie L; Wang Y; Yang B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 May; 139(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 30836805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
    Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparable Electrode Impedance and Speech Perception at 12 Months after Cochlear Implantation Using Round Window versus Cochleostomy: An Analysis of 40 Patients.
    Cheng X; Wang B; Liu Y; Yuan Y; Shu Y; Chen B
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2018; 80(5-6):248-258. PubMed ID: 30121670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in electrode impedance during and after cochlear implantation: Round window versus extended round window insertions.
    Wang J; Sun J; Sun J; Chen J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():44-48. PubMed ID: 29106874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral resolution and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the round window versus cochleostomy technique.
    Demir B; Yüksel M; Atılgan A; Ciprut A; Batman C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Jun; 135(6):513-517. PubMed ID: 33958008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
    Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants.
    Gudis DA; Montes M; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1497-501. PubMed ID: 22972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of depth of electrode insertion between cochleostomy and round window approach: a cadaveric study.
    Jangra A; Das KN; Sharma V; Timmaraju S; Khera P; Tiwari S; Soni K; Choudhury B; Ghatak S; Dixit SG; Nayyar AK; Goyal A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3547-3555. PubMed ID: 38294508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter surgical experience evaluation on the Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools.
    Gazibegovic D; Bero EM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):1147-1151. PubMed ID: 27515706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
    Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
    Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.
    Addams-Williams J; Munaweera L; Coleman B; Shepherd R; Backhouse S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S36-9. PubMed ID: 21917217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Minimally invasive surgical techniques of cochlear implantation withround window pathways in young children].
    Ma J; Ruan B; Mao ZY; Li SL; Gao YQ; Lin K; Zhang TS
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 30(12):978-981. PubMed ID: 29771067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
    Cuda D; Murri A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implantation outcomes with round window electrode insertion versus cochleostomy insertion.
    Elafandi H; Khalifa MA; Elguindy AS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110272. PubMed ID: 32798831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of minimally invasive, image-guided cochlear implantation using Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, and Medel electrodes in a cadaver model.
    McRackan TR; Balachandran R; Blachon GS; Mitchell JE; Noble JH; Wright CG; Fitzpatrick JM; Dawant BM; Labadie RF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Nov; 8(6):989-95. PubMed ID: 23633113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.