227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30836805)
1. Lower initial electrode impedances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
Liu X; Xie L; Wang Y; Yang B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 May; 139(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 30836805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparable Electrode Impedance and Speech Perception at 12 Months after Cochlear Implantation Using Round Window versus Cochleostomy: An Analysis of 40 Patients.
Cheng X; Wang B; Liu Y; Yuan Y; Shu Y; Chen B
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2018; 80(5-6):248-258. PubMed ID: 30121670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in electrode impedance during and after cochlear implantation: Round window versus extended round window insertions.
Wang J; Sun J; Sun J; Chen J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():44-48. PubMed ID: 29106874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spectral resolution and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the round window versus cochleostomy technique.
Demir B; Yüksel M; Atılgan A; Ciprut A; Batman C
J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Jun; 135(6):513-517. PubMed ID: 33958008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants.
Gudis DA; Montes M; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1497-501. PubMed ID: 22972422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of depth of electrode insertion between cochleostomy and round window approach: a cadaveric study.
Jangra A; Das KN; Sharma V; Timmaraju S; Khera P; Tiwari S; Soni K; Choudhury B; Ghatak S; Dixit SG; Nayyar AK; Goyal A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3547-3555. PubMed ID: 38294508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter surgical experience evaluation on the Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools.
Gazibegovic D; Bero EM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):1147-1151. PubMed ID: 27515706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.
Addams-Williams J; Munaweera L; Coleman B; Shepherd R; Backhouse S
Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S36-9. PubMed ID: 21917217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Minimally invasive surgical techniques of cochlear implantation withround window pathways in young children].
Ma J; Ruan B; Mao ZY; Li SL; Gao YQ; Lin K; Zhang TS
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 30(12):978-981. PubMed ID: 29771067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
Cuda D; Murri A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implantation outcomes with round window electrode insertion versus cochleostomy insertion.
Elafandi H; Khalifa MA; Elguindy AS
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110272. PubMed ID: 32798831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of minimally invasive, image-guided cochlear implantation using Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, and Medel electrodes in a cadaver model.
McRackan TR; Balachandran R; Blachon GS; Mitchell JE; Noble JH; Wright CG; Fitzpatrick JM; Dawant BM; Labadie RF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Nov; 8(6):989-95. PubMed ID: 23633113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
