These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30837435)

  • 1. Mini-implant-supported twin-block appliance: An innovative modification.
    Tripathi T; Singh N; Rai P; Gupta P
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Mar; 22(3):432-438. PubMed ID: 30837435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
    Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correction of a Overjet and Overbite In Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Using Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Case Report.
    Shastri D; Tandon P; Singh GK; Singh A; Sharma S
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(4):19-22. PubMed ID: 27029087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Tümer N; Gültan AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 10511676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical effectiveness of the Twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16254470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twin Block appliance with acrylic capping does not have a significant inhibitory effect on lower incisor proclination.
    van der Plas MC; Janssen KI; Pandis N; Livas C
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Jul; 87(4):513-518. PubMed ID: 28128634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion.
    Gönner U; Ozkan V; Jahn E; Toll DE
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Sep; 68(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 17882366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of the Twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 15947523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
    Luo Y; Fang G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twin-block appliance therapy.
    DeVincenzo J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):16A-18A. PubMed ID: 11174534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects.
    Ghodke S; Utreja AK; Singh SP; Jena AK
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):68. PubMed ID: 25534004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Yu Q; Li PL; Wang HH; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25543606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 27063315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The modified twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Dyer FM; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 28(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 11709592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.