These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30837917)

  • 1. Expertise, Automation and Trust in X-Ray Screening of Cabin Baggage.
    Chavaillaz A; Schwaninger A; Michel S; Sauer J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():256. PubMed ID: 30837917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Work design for airport security officers: Effects of rest break schedules and adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Schwaninger A; Michel S; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Sep; 79():66-75. PubMed ID: 31109463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automation in airport security X-ray screening of cabin baggage: Examining benefits and possible implementations of automated explosives detection.
    Hättenschwiler N; Sterchi Y; Mendes M; Schwaninger A
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():58-68. PubMed ID: 29885728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automation reliability, human-machine system performance, and operator compliance: A study with airport security screeners supported by automated explosives detection systems for cabin baggage screening.
    Huegli D; Merks S; Schwaninger A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103094. PubMed ID: 32342885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection measures for visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage.
    Sterchi Y; Hättenschwiler N; Schwaninger A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1297-1311. PubMed ID: 30684203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some cues are more equal than others: Cue plausibility for false alarms in baggage screening.
    Chavaillaz A; Schwaninger A; Michel S; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102916. PubMed ID: 31422292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automation in visual inspection tasks: X-ray luggage screening supported by a system of direct, indirect or adaptable cueing with low and high system reliability.
    Chavaillaz A; Schwaninger A; Michel S; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2018 Oct; 61(10):1395-1408. PubMed ID: 29799358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress-induced cortisol secretion impairs detection performance in x-ray baggage screening for hidden weapons by screening novices.
    Thomas L; Schwaninger A; Heimgartner N; Hedinger P; Hofer F; Ehlert U; Wirtz PH
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Sep; 51(9):912-20. PubMed ID: 24785002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When and Why Threats Go Undetected: Impacts of Event Rate and Shift Length on Threat Detection Accuracy During Airport Baggage Screening.
    Meuter RF; Lacherez PF
    Hum Factors; 2016 Mar; 58(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 26608048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners.
    Buser D; Schwaninger A; Sauer J; Sterchi Y
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Sep; 111():103995. PubMed ID: 37207523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting Bombs in X-Ray Images of Hold Baggage: 2D Versus 3D Imaging.
    Hättenschwiler N; Mendes M; Schwaninger A
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):305-321. PubMed ID: 30247937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age and automation interact to influence performance of a simulated luggage screening task.
    Wiegmann D; McCarley JS; Kramer AF; Wickens CD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Aug; 77(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 16909876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation.
    Pop VL; Shrewsbury A; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 25977317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the Efficiency of Automation-Aided Performance in a Simulated Baggage Screening Task.
    Boskemper MM; Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):945-961. PubMed ID: 33508964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric activation differences in novice and expert clinicians during clinical decision making.
    Hruska P; Hecker KG; Coderre S; McLaughlin K; Cortese F; Doig C; Beran T; Wright B; Krigolson O
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Dec; 21(5):921-933. PubMed ID: 26530736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bothered by abstractness or engaged by cohesion? Experts' explanations enhance novices' deep-learning.
    Lachner A; Nückles M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Mar; 21(1):101-15. PubMed ID: 25437792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced threat detection in three dimensions: An image-matched comparison of computed tomography and dual-view X-ray baggage screening.
    Parker MG; Muhl-Richardson A; Davis G
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Nov; 105():103834. PubMed ID: 35777185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are well-calibrated users effective users? Associations between calibration of trust and performance on an automation-aided task.
    Merritt SM; Lee D; Unnerstall JL; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 25790569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Video assessment of laparoscopic skills by novices and experts: implications for surgical education.
    Yeung C; Carrillo B; Pope V; Hosseinpour S; Gerstle JT; Azzie G
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):3883-3889. PubMed ID: 28205036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.