These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30838953)

  • 1. [Federal Supreme Court Decisions in Medical Law (2000-2017) - Overview and Selected Case Reports].
    Vokinger KN; Mühlematter UJ
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2019; 108(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 30838953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do Legal Issues Deserve Space in Specialty Medical Journals ?
    Nagpal N
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2016 Feb; 64(2):86-87. PubMed ID: 27730795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments.
    Hamasaki T; Hagihara A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 16(1):72. PubMed ID: 26498823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?
    Trueman DL
    Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Professional misconduct in obstetrics and gynecology in light of the Supreme Medical Court between 2002-2012].
    Kordel P; Kordel K
    Ginekol Pol; 2014 Nov; 85(11):860-6. PubMed ID: 25675805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
    Darney PD; Rosenfield A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):226-7. PubMed ID: 17666593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preserving Do No Harm: Supreme Court Tosses Challenge to Medical Ethics Committee Law.
    Berlin J
    Tex Med; 2020 Feb; 116(2):22-23. PubMed ID: 32083712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A neo-institutional analysis of the hidden interaction between the Israeli Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance: the right to healthcare services.
    Sperling D; Cohen N
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2018 Nov; 7(1):71. PubMed ID: 30482250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion and informed consent requirements.
    Kapp MB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7114096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. State court finds Michigan mandatory delay law unconstitutional.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):2-3. PubMed ID: 12287945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prescription data mining, medical privacy and the First Amendment: the U.S. Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS health Inc.
    Boumil MM; Dunn K; Ryan N; Clearwater K
    Ann Health Law; 2012; 21(2):447-91, 4 p preceding i. PubMed ID: 22606922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
    Massie AM
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A chill wind blows: Webster, obstetrics, and the health of women.
    Chavkin W; Rosenfield A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 163(2):450-2. PubMed ID: 2386130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures].
    Müller S
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2018 Aug; 86(8):485-492. PubMed ID: 30125919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Let them eat cake.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 330463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A matter of life or death. By upholding an assisted-suicide law, the Supreme Court helps reinforce the rights of doctors, patients and the statest.
    Taylor M
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Jan; 36(4):6-7, 14, 1. PubMed ID: 16480096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom.
    Lombardo PA
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9068235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.